[a. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on a request to amend the Future Land Use Designation Place Type in the Future Land Use Plan of the Anna 2050 Comprehensive Plan of 10.8± acres from Estate Residential to Suburban Living in accordance with the Church Tract Development Agreement (Res. No. 2025-12-1873).]

ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS.

ITEM NUMBER EIGHT A CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING.

CONSIDER DISCUSS ACTION ON A REQUEST TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION PLACE TYPE IN THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN OF THE ANNA 2050 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF 10.8 PLUS OR MINUS

[00:05:03]

ACRES FROM ESTATE, RESIDENTIAL TO SUBURBAN LIVING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHURCH TRACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. THE ITEM BEFORE YOU IS A AMENDMENT TO THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN.

THIS ITEM IS TO AMEND THE PLAN FROM ESTATE RESIDENTIAL TO SUBURBAN LIVING FOR 10.8 ACRES AS DESCRIBED IN YOUR PACKET.

IT IS BEST PRACTICE FOR A ZONING CASE AND ANNEXATION THAT ISN'T EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE COMP PLAN TO ALSO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.

HOWEVER, IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, IT WAS NOT SOMETHING THAT WAS SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT, WHICH IS WHY WE DIDN'T BRING IT BEFORE.

AND THE REASON I SAY SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT IS BECAUSE THERE'S LIMITATIONS ON THE ETJ DEVELOPMENT.

CITIES IN TEXAS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO USE CERTAIN ZONING LIKE TOOLS SUCH AS LAND USE, BUILDING SIZE, OR DENSITY. I KNOW THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS QUESTIONED AT OUR LAST MEETING ABOUT THE DENSITY OF THIS PROPERTY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN.

HOWEVER, THAT IS JUST SOMETHING THAT WE CANNOT DENY A PLAT FOR.

THE PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN OR THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN IS ALLOWED TO BE DEVELOPED AS WAS SHOWN.

AND SO FOR THOSE REASONS, WITH THE SURROUNDING LIBERTY HILLS DEVELOPMENT AS A SUBURBAN LIVING DESIGNATION PLACE TYPE WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL FOR CHANGING THIS PROPERTY FROM A STATE RESIDENTIAL TO SUBURBAN LIVING.

AND IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING. WE RECEIVED NO COMMENTS OR WE RECEIVED ONE COMMENT TODAY THAT IS PRINTED OUT FOR YOU.

AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:39 P.M..

DOES ANY COMMISSIONER HAVE TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I HAVE ONE LAWN, SO ORIGINALLY THE TREE PRESERVATION WAS WAIVED FOR LIBERTY HILLS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

DID THEY GET GRANDFATHERED IN THE SAME LIBERTIES AS THAT ONE? I'M SORRY. SAY THAT AGAIN. THE TREE PRESERVATION WAS WAIVED FOR LIBERTY HILLS BECAUSE THIS IS GOING TO ESSENTIALLY BECOME A SECOND PART. THAT IS PART OF THE ZONING REQUEST.

YES. THIS ITEM BEFORE YOU IS JUST FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN AS IT RELATES TO ESTATE, RESIDENTIAL TO SUBURBAN LIVING.

OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DOES THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE ANNEXATION PLAN? NO. SO WE SPECIFICALLY WITHDREW THAT ITEM FROM COUNCIL CONSIDERATION UNTIL THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAD TIME TO REVIEW THIS ITEM.

THEY ARE SCHEDULED FOR THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.

THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT HERE OR DO THEY WISH TO SPEAK? NOPE. OKAY, I DO HAVE A SPEAKER CARD ON THIS ITEM.

SO JUST A REMINDER, SPEAKERS WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES TO PRESENT THEIR COMMENTS. PLEASE CLEARLY STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. TERRELL CULBERTSON.

GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

MY NAME IS TERRELL CULBERTSON. I LIVE AT 10429 COUNTY ROAD 289 AND A TEXAS.

I'D LIKE TO REVIEW A LITTLE BIT OF THE HISTORY OF THIS PROPERTY.

BUT FIRST I WILL STATE I AM NOT OPPOSED TO CHANGING THE LAND USE ON THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY SINCE IT'S ALL THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY.

THAT'S OWNED BY LIBERTY HILLS IS IN THE SUBURBAN LIVING CATEGORY, SO I'M NOT OPPOSED TO THAT.

ORIGINALLY THIS PROPERTY WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE CITY LIMITS BECAUSE DALE AND JOYCE CHURCH DID NOT WANT TO BE IN THE CITY LIMITS.

AND SO WHEN THE TWO 500 ACRE TRACTS WERE ANNEXED AND ZONED UP, THIS WAS NOT INCLUDED. AND SO IT REMAINED AS RESIDENTIAL. I'M SORRY, ESTATE RESIDENTIAL.

AT YOUR APRIL 6TH MEETING, THERE WAS A REQUEST TO GET A RECOMMENDATION FROM PLANNING AND ZONING TO EITHER TO ANNEX THIS PROPERTY INTO THE CITY LIMITS.

AND AFTER A LENGTHY DISCUSSION, YOU VOTED 3 TO 2 TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TO DO THAT.

I BELIEVE THAT YOU MISSED AN OPPORTUNITY AT THAT TIME TO INCORPORATE A REQUIREMENT TO BRING BACK THE TREE

[00:10:02]

PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS AS IT PERTAINS TO THE TEN ACRES.

THE SHIP HAS SAILED ON ALL THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY.

BUT I BELIEVE THAT FOR THIS TEN ACRES THAT YOU HAVE THE POWER, YOU HAVE THE AUTHORITY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, YOU HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO REQUEST THAT THAT AND REQUIRE THAT THAT TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS IT PERTAINS TO THAT TEN ACRES.

AND I HOPE THAT YOU CONSIDER DOING THAT THIS EVENING.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. THAT'S ALL THE SPEAKER CARDS WE HAVE.

SO I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:43 P.M.

AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF. SO THIS IS STRICTLY JUST APPROVING TO CHANGE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR NOT.

THAT'S THE ONLY THING WE'RE GOING ON TONIGHT. THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. YES. ARE WE GOING TO SEE THIS AGAIN IN FRONT OF US TO BE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING WITH IT, OR IS THIS GOING STRAIGHT TO CITY COUNCIL? THIS IS GOING TO CITY COUNCIL AT THEIR NEXT MEETING.

OKAY. CAN WE MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS OUTSIDE OF WHAT WE'RE VOTING ON TONIGHT FOR CITY COUNCIL? TYPICALLY NOT BECAUSE THIS IS THE ONLY ACTION THAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. LET'S DISCUSS. WHAT DO YOU GUYS THINK? YEAH. I DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE WITH THE THE ZONING CHANGE OR THE.

YEAH. THE ZONING CHANGE TO THE SUBURBAN LIVING.

BUT I UNDERSTAND MR. CULBERTSON'S POINT. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S ANYTHING WE CAN DO ABOUT IT, THOUGH, RELATED TO THIS, BUT YEAH, I, I UNDERSTAND WHAT HE'S SAYING AND TRYING TO GET SOME TYPE OF PRE TREE PRESERVATION ATTACHED TO THIS PIECE I THINK WOULD BE IMPORTANT.

I DO TOO, THAT'S WHY I ASKED THE QUESTION, CAN WE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION IN ADDITION TO WHAT WE'RE VOTING ON TONIGHT AND WAS TOLD NO BY STAFF? SO I GUESS THAT MEANS IT NEEDS TO BE SPOKEN UP AT CITY COUNCIL, AND THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO MAKE THE RECOMMENDATION WHEN THEY APPROVE.

YEAH, I THINK I THINK THAT YEAH, IT HAS TO BE HANDLED AT A CITY COUNCIL LEVEL.

SO AT THE NEXT CITY COUNCIL MEETING. I THINK THAT'S THE PLACE TO ADDRESS IT.

YEAH. SO I DO HATE TO SEE US CHANGING THE 2050 PLAN AFTER WE JUST REWORKED IT.

IT DOES IN THIS CASE, MAKE SOME SENSE SINCE EVERYTHING ELSE AROUND IT'S ALREADY BEEN SET AS URBAN LIVING.

BUT IN GENERAL, I HATE TO DO THAT SO SOON AFTER WE REWORKED IT.

THAT'S JUST A COMMENT. OKAY, I'M GOING TO MOVE TO APPROVE ITEM EIGHT A UNDER INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.

I'LL SECOND. OKAY. COMMISSIONERS THIS MATTER IS NOW OPEN FOR VOTE.

PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTES.

MOTION IS GOING TO PASS SIX ONE. MOVING ON TO ITEM EIGHT B CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING.

[b. Conduct a Public Hearing/Consider/Discuss/Action on a recommendation to amend Article 9.04 (Zoning Ordinance) adopting regulations as it pertains to drone delivery infrastructure. (TA 26-0002)]

CONSIDER DISCUSS ACTION ON A RECOMMENDATION TO AMEND ARTICLE 9.04 ADOPTING REGULATIONS AS IT PERTAINS TO DRONE DELIVERY INFRASTRUCTURE.

THANK YOU FOR TABLING THIS ITEM AT LAST MONTH'S MEETING.

WORKING WITH OUR FRIENDS OVER AT ZIPLINE, WE HAVE REFINED THE LANGUAGE AND IT'S ATTACHED TO YOUR STAFF REPORT.

A RED LINE VERSION OF THE CHANGES SINCE THE LAST TIME WE MET ON THIS ITEM.

IF THERE'S ANYTHING IN PARTICULAR YOU WANT TO DISCUSS I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

OTHERWISE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS WRITTEN.

I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:46 P.M.. DOES ANY COMMISSIONER HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS? NO. NO. I READ THROUGH THE CHANGES, I THOUGHT.

GOOD JOB. THANK YOU. YEAH. I FEEL LIKE YOU CAUGHT EVERYTHING THAT WE WANTED.

OKAY. WE DON'T HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS, DO WE? I DON'T HAVE ANY UP HERE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WELL, SHORT AND SWEET.

I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:46 P.M.

AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO COMMISSION AND STAFF.

CAN I GET A MOTION ON AGENDA ITEM EIGHT B? MOTION TO APPROVE.