[1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum.] [00:00:05] 06:32 P.M.. TONIGHT WE ARE MISSING COMMISSIONER VOLLMER AND STEWART. QUORUM HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. IF EVERYONE WILL PLEASE RISE FOR THE INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN. DEAR HEAVENLY FATHER, AS WE CENTER OURSELVES IN GRATITUDE FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE OUR COMMUNITY, MAY WE COME TOGETHER IN A SPIRIT OF SERVICE, GUIDED BY WISDOM, WITH OPEN HEARTS AND CLEAR MINDS. AMEN. AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE TEXAS ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE. THANKS, GOD. I KNOW. I'M. GONNA MOVE ON TO NEIGHBOR COMMENTS. AT THIS TIME, ANY PERSON MAY ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING AN ITEM ON THIS MEETING AGENDA THAT IS NOT SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING. ALSO, AT THIS TIME, ANY PERSON MAY ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING AN ITEM THAT IS NOT ON THIS MEETING AGENDA. EACH PERSON WILL BE ALLOWED UP TO THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK. NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AT THIS MEETING ON ITEMS LISTED ON THIS AGENDA, OTHER THAN TO MAKE STATEMENTS OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO A NEIGHBOR'S INQUIRY, OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY. [4. Director's Report.] I'M GOING TO GO TO ITEM NUMBER 4, DIRECTOR'S REPORT, DIRECTOR KALEB KENTNER. ALL RIGHT. CHAIR AND COMMISSION. YOU HAVE IN YOUR PACKETS. THE OR ACTUALLY, IT'LL BE ON THE SCREEN. THE UPDATED REPORT, MONTHLY REPORT OF WHAT ACTIONS YOU GUYS HAVE TAKEN IN THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS THAT ARE IN PROGRESS CURRENTLY STILL. AND THOSE THAT YOU ARE HEARING TODAY THAT ARE ON THE AGENDA, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY. IF NOT, I'LL, ONE OTHER THING IS JUST TO GIVE YOU GUYS A QUICK UPDATE ON THE DIRECTION THAT WAS GIVEN TO STAFF TO WORK ON THE SUBDIVISION UPDATE REGULATIONS. WE ARE IN THE MIDST OF THAT. WE'VE KIND OF GONE THROUGH THE RED LINE. JUST TO KIND OF GIVE YOU AN UPDATE, IT'S GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFICULT THAN WE THOUGHT AS FAR AS HAVING TWO RED LINES, I ALWAYS LIKE TO BE ABLE TO SHOW YOU GUYS WHAT'S CHANGED. WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE? IT'S GOING TO BE A LITTLE A LITTLE BIT DIFFICULT TO DO THAT, BUT WE WILL WE'RE GOING THROUGH THAT JUST BECAUSE THE FORMATTING IS CHANGING PRETTY SUBSTANTIALLY BASED ON THE DIRECTION TO HELP SIMPLIFY THE REGULATIONS AND PUT IT IN AN ORDER THAT'S EASIER FOR OUR NEIGHBORS, FOR THE COMMISSIONERS, AND FOR DEVELOPERS TO BE ABLE TO GET THROUGH THAT ORDINANCE AND MAKE IT A LOT MORE SIMPLIFIED ON THAT. BUT WE SHOULD HAVE FOR YOU SEVERAL ITEMS FOR US TO DISCUSS AT THE NEXT MEETING. IT'LL BE ON AS A WORK TOPIC ITEM TO DISCUSS SOME THINGS WHERE WE MAY NEED SOME CLARITY ON AS WE MOVE FORWARD. AND FOLLOWING THAT MEETING, WE SHOULD BE PREPARED TO BE ABLE TO HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED AND HAVE THAT BEFORE YOU FOR YOUR RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL. THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO REPORT. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 6, CONSENT ITEMS. [6. Consent Items.] DOES ANY COMMISSIONER WISH TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? OKAY. IS THERE A MOTION ON CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A THROUGH D. I MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND. OKAY, I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL AND A SECOND. THIS MATTER IS NOW OPEN FOR VOTE. COMMISSIONERS, PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. [00:05:25] SORRY EVERYONE, PLEASE NOW CAST YOUR VOTES. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. MOVING ON [7. Items For Individual Consideration and Public Hearings.] TO ITEM NUMBER 7, ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION AND PUBLIC HEARINGS. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER/DISCUSS/ACTION ON A RECOMMENDATION FOR REQUEST TO ANNEX AND AMEND AN EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO INCORPORATE AN ADDITIONAL 10.8 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 290 AND COUNTY ROAD 290/COUNTY ROAD 1101, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHURCH TRACT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. GOOD EVENING. NO ITEM WILL BE TAKEN. NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN ON THIS ITEM TONIGHT. EXCUSE ME. BECAUSE WE HAD ALREADY SENT OUT THE NOTICES. BUT WE HAD MISSED THE. THE POSTED SIGN, AS WELL AS THE NEW REQUIREMENT FOR THE WEBSITE. SO NO ACTION CAN BE TAKEN TONIGHT ON THIS ITEM. OKAY. DO YOU NEED US TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT THE NO ACTION? NO. DO WE NEED TO VOTE ON NO ACTION OR TABLING? NO. THERE'S NO ACTION. JUST ON THIS DUE TO THE, AS LAUREN HAS EXPLAINED, THERE'S THE. OKAY. THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM 7.B, DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION ON ZIPPING POINTS. I'M GOOD. ALL RIGHT, SO LAST YEAR WE HAD AMENDED THE WALMART PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR THE COMMERCIAL DRONE DELIVERY HUB IN PARTNERSHIP WITH ZIPLINE. THE REPRESENTATIVES FROM ZIPLINE HAVE CONTACTED KALEB AND I AND HAVE TOLD US THAT THEY HAVE THESE SMALLER SCALED ACCESSORY PICKUP LOCATION DEVICES THAT THEY'RE CALLING ZIPPING POINTS. THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR MORE BUSINESSES TO UTILIZE THE DRONES THAT ARE CHARGING AT THE WALMART SITE. ACCORDING TO THE REPRESENTATIVES, THERE WOULD BE NO ELECTRICAL PERMITS NOR STRUCTURAL ANCHORING REQUIRED FOR THESE DEVICES. THEY HAVE A FEW LOCATIONS WHERE THEY HAVE ALREADY INSTALLED THEM. THE FIRST ONE IN THE DFW AREA WAS AT A CHIPOTLE IN ROWLETT, WHICH THE VIDEO LINK WAS, OR THE PRESS RELEASE WAS ATTACHED IN YOUR STAFF REPORT. SO SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE JUST WANT TO TALK ABOUT, WE WANT TO GET YOUR OPINIONS. DO WE NEED TO HAVE REGULATIONS FOR THESE TYPES OF DEVICES? OBVIOUSLY THESE ARE VERY DIFFERENT FROM THE ONES THAT ARE ON WALMART'S PROPERTY AND THAT THOSE REQUIRED A NEW SITE PLAN AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING TO BE INVOLVED. BUT SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE YOU KNOW, WE COULD EITHER PROCEED FORWARD WITH LETTING THEM CHOOSE THE LOCATION OF THESE DEVICES. YOU KNOW, SIMILAR TO LIKE, A MAILBOX. CURRENTLY, WE DON'T REGULATE THOSE. OR WOULD WE PREFER TO HAVE SOMETHING IN PLACE? DO WE WANT IT TO BE BEHIND THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING? DO. WOULD THIS REQUIRE MECHANICAL SCREENING THE SAME WAY THAT WE DO FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT? WHAT IF THEY WANT TO PUT IT IN A PARKING SPACE? WOULD WE REQUIRE A PARKING REDUCTION? SO THIS ITEM IS JUST A DISCUSSION AND DIRECTION. NO ACTUAL ACTION WILL BE TAKEN. BUT WE JUST WANTED TO GET YOUR FEEDBACK ON YOUR THOUGHTS ON THESE NEW TECHNOLOGIES COMING IN. COMMISSIONERS, YOU GUYS HAVE ANY THOUGHTS OR QUESTIONS THAT WE CAN BOUNCE OFF EACH OTHER. WHEN WE ORIGINALLY APPROVED THIS FOR WALMART, I THINK THAT THEY TOOK UP SOME OF THEIR PARKING SPACES FOR THIS, RIGHT. DID WE HAVE TO REZONE FOR THEM? SO WE DID AMEND THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR SOME OF THE REGULATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH IT, BUT WE DID NOT ACTUALLY. THEY ACTUALLY ADDED PARKING WHEN THEY DID THAT. THEY ADDED PARKING. OKAY. INTERESTINGLY THE WAY THAT THEY RECONFIGURED THAT AREA PARKING WAS ADDED TO IT [00:10:09] INSTEAD OF TAKING AWAY PARKING. IT, WHERE THEY PUT THE COMMERCIAL DRONE HUB WAS WHERE THE PICKUP LINE FOR THE PHARMACY WAS. OKAY. SO I DEFINITELY THINK SOMETHING SHOULD BE IN PLACE FOR THESE NOT TO BE, LIKE, IN FRONT OF THE BUSINESSES. YEAH. RIGHT. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT MAYBE SHOULD BE A LITTLE BIT MORE HIDDEN, YOU KNOW, THAN THAN VISIBLE IN THE FRONT. I WOULD THINK THEY'D WANT IT BLOCKED OFF ANYWAYS, JUST FOR SECURITY PURPOSES. I MEAN, I DON'T WANT TO BE LOOKING AT IT, BUT I THINK THEY WOULD WANT IT SOMEWHAT HIDDEN TOO. MY THOUGHTS ARE WE SHOULD AT LEAST MAYBE GET SOME PUBLIC FEEDBACK. SO IF WE PUT IT ON THE AGENDA, WE CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THAT ALLOWS PEOPLE WHO WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT, DISCUSS ANY KIND OF ISSUES THAT THEY HAVE WITH IT. WE CAN GET THEIR OPINIONS AS WELL VERSUS JUST PUSHING IT STRAIGHT THROUGH. I KNOW WE GET A LOT OF FEEDBACK FOR THAT, AND IT WOULD BE A GOOD OPPORTUNITY TO ALLOW THEM TO HAVE A VOICE ON THE TOPIC. SO I DON'T KNOW HOW I FEEL ABOUT REPLATTING, BUT I MEAN, IF THEY MAKE ANY SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES, REPLATTING IS ALWAYS SOMETHING THAT'S REQUIRED. I KNOW THIS IS SUCH A SMALL THING, BUT WHAT IF IT BECOMES TWO DRONES? THREE DRONES, YOU KNOW, TO KEEP UP WITH EVERY RESTAURANT? NO, ABSOLUTELY EVERYBODY'S GOING TO WANT TO USE THIS. WHAT ABOUT THE. I'M SORRY. CAN YOU HEAR ME? WHAT ABOUT IF YOU HAVE TWO OR 3 OR 4 UP IN THE AIR. I DON'T MEAN I DON'T KNOW, I DON'T WANT TO REGULATE ANYBODY'S AIRSPACE OR ANYTHING, BUT IT DEFINITELY NEEDS TO BE DISCUSSED. YEAH, I THINK MY THOUGHT EXACTLY. HOW MANY OF THESE DO YOU HAVE RUNNING AROUND? YOU'VE GOT WALMART. I'VE SEEN 3 OR 4 UP AT A TIME ALREADY. THE SKY IS FULL OF LIGHTS. HOW DO THEY KEEP FROM RUNNING INTO EACH OTHER? IT'S LIKE AN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL PROBLEM. WELL, ZIPLINE IS REGULATED RIGHT BY THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. THEY FOLLOW THEIR RULES AND THEIR GUIDELINES. AND THEY'RE ALSO CURRENTLY THE ONLY COMPANY DOING THIS. SO UNLESS THERE WERE LIKE OTHER COMPANIES THAT WOULD, YOU KNOW, MAYBE SOMETIME LATER YOU CAN SAY, YOU KNOW, ONE COMPANY AT A TIME IN OUR CITY, BUT THEY'RE THE ONLY ONES THAT ARE ALSO APPROVED FOR DOING THIS IN ALL 50 STATES IN THE UNITED STATES. ACTUALLY, THEY'RE JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, THEY'RE ACTUALLY MULTIPLE COMPANIES NOW AVAILABLE TO, TO PROVIDE THIS SERVICE. RIGHT. BUT YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT, IT'S. BUT WE ONLY ALLOWED THIS ONE COMPANY IN OUR CITY. RIGHT NOW. CORRECT. RIGHT NOW. YEAH, THAT'S THE ONLY ONE THAT'S BEEN APPROVED. AND SO, YEAH, GIVING US SOME DIRECTION ON THAT AND WE CAN, STAFF CAN THEN COME UP WITH 3 OR 4 ALTERNATIVES TO BRING BACK FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THAT TO HELP GIVE SOME DIRECTION ON THAT. AND SO GIVING US SOME DIRECTION ON THAT, LIKE SCREENING IT BEHIND THE BUILDINGS. THE OTHER QUESTION IS, WOULD THEY GET TO THE POINT WHERE THEY WANT TWO OF THEM UP AT ONE TIME OR MULTIPLE ONES, YOU KNOW BECAUSE THEY THIS IS A NEW TECHNOLOGY. IT'S CHANGING, AND ALL THESE TECHNOLOGIES ARE CHANGING. SO IT'S ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT YOUR GUIDANCE IN HELPING US COME UP WITH SOME ALTERNATIVES. BRING BACK BEFORE YOU. ONE, ZIPLINE IS ONLY A TEN-YEAR-OLD COMPANY, BUT THEY'RE THE FIRST OF THEIR KIND TO DO THIS RIGHT. THEY LAUNCHED TEN YEARS AGO IN RWANDA FOCUSING EXCLUSIVELY ON BLOOD DELIVERY TO HOSPITALS. THAT'S CORRECT. YEAH. THERE'S I BELIEVE THERE'S OTHER COMPANIES NOW THAT ARE MIMICKING OR DOING THE SAME THINGS. AND SO BUT ALL OF THEM DO LIKE THE FAA REQUIREMENTS. WE CAN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THAT PORTION OF IT. BUT THEY ARE REQUIRED, AND THAT WOULD BE A MANDATE THAT THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW FOR THE FEDERAL GUIDELINES FOR THOSE AS WELL. BUT WE DEFINITELY CAN CONTROL THE LOCATIONS WHERE THEY GO WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY. SO AND YOU SAID MULTIPLE KALEB, ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT MULTIPLE AT ONE BUSINESS VERSUS MULTIPLES AROUND THE CITY? YES. SO FOR EXAMPLE, RIGHT NOW WALMART IS THE ONLY CARRIER RIGHT NOW FOR ZIPLINE. BUT THEY COULD GO AT OTHER LOCATIONS. OTHER BUSY USERS COULD USE IT. THESE ARE THEIR ALTERNATIVES RIGHT NOW THAT THEY EXPLAINED TO US. IS THAT LIKE CHIPOTLE, OTHER BUSINESSES MAY CHOOSE TO USE THESE AS PICKUPS IN DELIVERY OR TO HAVE THEIR DELIVERIES MADE FROM THOSE LOCATIONS. AND SO ALL THESE BUSINESSES CAN ADD TO THEM AND THEIR. WHO KNOWS WHETHER OR NOT WALMART WITH THEIR CONTRACT, HOW LONG THEY HAVE, WITH HOW MANY UNITS THAT THEY'RE ABLE TO DO BEFORE THEY MAY NEED TO BUILD A SECOND LOCATION SIMILAR TO WHAT THEY HAVE AT WALMART? [00:15:03] WE JUST DON'T KNOW YET BECAUSE IT'S ALL ALL NEW. SO BUT THE RECEPTION SO FAR, WHAT WE'VE HEARD AND WHAT WE'VE SEEN NOT ONLY FROM IN ANNA BUT FROM OTHER COMMUNITIES THAT THESE ARE IN THEY'RE RECEIVED VERY WELL. IT DOES CUT DOWN ON TRAFFIC ON SOME OF THOSE THINGS BECAUSE IT'S ALL AERIAL VERSUS DRIVERS, DELIVERY DRIVERS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. AND THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU GUYS KEEP IN MIND IS THAT THAT'S THE MAIN GOAL OF ZONING REGULATIONS, IS TO PROTECT THE HEALTH, WELFARE AND SAFETY OF THE COMMUNITY, AND HOW CAN WE DO THAT BEST. AND THEY DID PROVIDE US INFORMATION ABOUT THE WIND LOADS, SNOW LOADS, THE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THESE STRUCTURES THAT ARE THERE. SO THEY DO MEET THE WIND LOADS AND SNOW LOADS AND ANY THE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS. IT'S JUST WHETHER OR NOT WE TREAT THEM LIKE A KIOSK, LIKE A VENDING MACHINE OR SOME OTHER TYPE OF BECAUSE THEY'RE SO NEW. SO ANY OF YOUR THOUGHTS WILL HELP US PUT SOME IDEAS TOGETHER FOR YOU. YEAH. I THINK IF, LIKE JESSICA SAID, IF WE COULD DO A PUBLIC HEARING, THAT'S A GOOD IDEA. AND THEN IF YOU GUYS COULD COME BACK TO US WITH MAYBE LIKE SOME SCREENING OPTIONS, YOU KNOW, LIKE YOU DO WITH DUMPSTERS THAT I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, LIKE EITHER PLACING IT BEHIND THE BUILDING OR MAKE SURE IT'S SCREENED APPROPRIATELY SO IT'S NOT AN EYESORE AND YOU JUST HAVE A BUNCH OF. I'M LESS WORRIED ABOUT THE PARKING BECAUSE YOU WOULD THINK IF THEY'RE USING MORE DELIVERY, THAT MEANS LESS PEOPLE ARE COMING. SO FROM A PARKING RATIO STANDPOINT, IT SEEMS LIKE THAT MIGHT KIND OF OFFSET ITSELF. BUT YEAH, I'D BE DEFINITELY OPEN TO, SINCE IT'S SUCH A NEW TECHNOLOGY. LET'S LOOK AT SOME IDEAS ON HOW INVOLVED WE NEED TO BE WITH THIS. I SUSPECT THERE'S SOME IF SOME OTHER CITIES HAVE IT, THERE'S SOME BENCHMARKING YOU COULD DO TO SAVE YOURSELF SOME WORK FROM DOING A LOT OF FROM SCRATCH REGULATION TYPE STUFF. SO THANK YOU. WHAT ABOUT YOUR THOUGHT ON REPLATTING? TO ME, IF THEY GET 3 OR 4 OF THEM, I MEAN, LIKE IF YOU MAKE CHANGES TO A BUILDING, WE NOW CURRENTLY PROPOSE THAT IT HAS TO BE REPLATTED, RIGHT? I MEAN, SO WHY WOULDN'T WE WANT THEM TO REPLAT TO SHOW THAT THEY'RE THERE ON THEIR PLAT? MAYBE IT'S A CERTAIN NUMBER OF THEM THAT COME ONTO THE PLAT BEFORE WE REPLAT, BUT I DON'T SEE WHY WE WOULDN'T INCLUDE THIS TO BE JUST LIKE A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE OR PARKING COUNT. WHY WOULD THIS BE ANY DIFFERENT THAN HAVING TO REPLAT THESE BUSINESSES? WELL, ACTUALLY, I THINK THIS MIGHT BE BETTER THAT THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HAVE IT UPDATED. SITE PLAN BECAUSE THE DUMPSTERS AREN'T ACTUALLY SHOWN ON THE ON THE ON THE SITE PLANS. YEAH, THE DETAILS OF THAT AREN'T ON THERE, BUT THEY WOULD BE ON THE SITE PLAN. SO THAT'S ONE THING THAT WE HAVE DISCUSSED IS WHETHER OR NOT. UPDATED SITE PLAN. UPDATED SITE PLAN WOULD BE REQUIRED FOR EACH LOCATION. EVEN IF IT'S JUST THE AREA THAT'S IMPACTED BY WHERE THEY WANT TO LOCATE IT. MODIFIED JUST TO HELP SAVE TIME AND COSTS AND SUCH. BUT THAT'S SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE SEEN, SO. I LIKE THAT IDEA BECAUSE, LIKE, THEY'RE NOT PULLING ELECTRICAL, RIGHT? AT LEAST FOR NOW. THEY'RE NOT PULLING ELECTRICAL. SO HOPEFULLY. BUT IT WOULD BE GOOD TO HAVE A SITE PLAN UPDATE. AND THEN ALSO YOU SEE LIKE ON THIS THAT THE PICTURE THAT YOU'VE SHOWN HERE, THEY'RE CREATING IMPERVIOUS COVER. SO THAT MIGHT BE SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT AS WELL. IF THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE A GRASSY AREA AND ALL OF A SUDDEN TURN IT INTO CONCRETE OR PAVERS LIKE THEY HAVE HERE, THAT'S GOING TO AFFECT THE DRAINAGE AND ENGINEERING. I THINK A SITE PLAN TO KEEPS THEM FROM MOVING IT LATER. I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW HOW EASY IT IS, BUT SINCE THEY'RE NOT PULLING ELECTRICAL, BUT IF THEY DECIDE IT'S NOT IN A LOCATION THEY LIKE AND THEY CHANGE IT AROUND THE OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING, AT LEAST WE'RE HOLDING THEM ACCOUNTABLE FOR WHAT THEY'RE PUTTING OUT THERE. ANY OTHER MAJOR CONCERNS THAT YOU GUYS COULD SEE THAT YOU WANT US TO BE SURE TO ADDRESS OR LOOK INTO? I MEAN, IT SOUNDS LIKE WHAT YOU HAVE LISTED HERE, LOCATION SEPARATION SCREENING. LIKE YOU SAID, I DON'T THINK PARKING REDUCTIONS NECESSARILY A BAD THING. BUT IN OUR P&Z, IT DOES STATE CERTAIN AMOUNT OF PARKING SPACES THAT HAVE TO BE UPHELD TO THESE BUSINESSES. SO TO ME, IF THEY PLAN ON TAKING THEM OUT, THERE SHOULD BE SOMETHING THEY SHOULD AT LEAST GET A WAIVER OR SOMETHING TO SAY THAT THEY CAN REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF PARKING AND THEY NEED TO JUSTIFY WHY. SO I THINK THAT WOULD STILL BE SOMETHING, ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE GOING TO GROW FROM 1 TO 4, BECAUSE I DON'T SEE HOW ONE WILL KEEP UP WITH LUNCHTIME RUSH. YOU KNOW, IT JUST DOESN'T SEEM FEASIBLE. ALL OF US RIGHT HERE COULD CALL IN ONE. AND THEN THERE GOES YOUR DRONE FOR AN HOUR. AND HAVE WE HEARD, HAS THERE BEEN ANY FEEDBACK WITH THE EXISTING ONES WE HAVE WITH WALMART? [00:20:05] AS FAR AS NOISE GOES FROM THE RESIDENTS, HAS THERE BEEN ANY COMPLAINTS? I WILL, WE'LL DOUBLE CHECK WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY. ANECDOTALLY, I'VE HEARD PEOPLE HAVE SAID THAT THEY COULD HEAR THEM AND BUT HAVEN'T I TO MY KNOWLEDGE, I DON'T BELIEVE WE HAVE, BUT WE'LL CONFIRM THAT AND BRING THAT INFORMATION BACK TO YOU AND LET YOU KNOW IF WE HAVE. OKAY, THANKS. THAT WOULD BE GOOD TO KNOW. AS FAR AS YOU KNOW, DO WE NEED TO MANDATE A CERTAIN DISTANCE FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS. SO DO WE NEED TO MAKE A MOTION TO CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING? OKAY. WELL, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. I'LL SECOND. OKAY. ALL COMMISSIONERS, IF YOU'LL PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUS. ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME, DOES ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANYTHING ELSE THEY'D LIKE TO ADDRESS? NO. ALL RIGHT. STAFF? NO. ALL RIGHT, THEN I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. I'M GOING TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 6:54 P.M.. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.