[1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum.]
[00:00:05]
GOOD EVENING. WELCOME TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANNA.
WE WILL MEET ON 3-3-2025 AT 6 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS.
THE TIME IS NOW 6:03 P.M.. WE ARE CURRENTLY MISSING COMMISSIONER BERGERSON AND COMMISSIONER NYLEC.
QUORUM HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. IF YOU'LL ALL RISE FOR THE INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN. AS WE GATHER TONIGHT TO DISCUSS THE AFFAIRS OF OUR CITY, WE HUMBLY ASK FOR YOUR GUIDANCE.
ALLOW US TO MAKE DECISIONS THAT ARE JUST AND BENEFICIAL TO ALL.
MOVING ON TO NEIGHBOR COMMENTS. AT THIS TIME, ANY PERSON MAY ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING AN ITEM ON THIS MEETING AGENDA THAT IS NOT SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
EACH PERSON WILL BE ALLOWED UP TO THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AT THIS MEETING ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA, OTHER THAN TO MAKE STATEMENTS OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO A NEIGHBOR'S INQUIRY, OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY.
[4. Director's Report.]
THE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.FIRST AND FOREMOST, I'D LIKE TO INTRODUCE A NEW STAFF MEMBER.
HER NAME IS JAMIE HAWTHORNE, AND SHE IS OUR NEW SUPPORT SPECIALIST IN OUR DEPARTMENT.
AND YOU WILL SEE JAMIE HELPING US OUT AT THE P&Z MEETING.
SO, JAMIE, IF YOU'D LIKE TO JUST SAY HELLO. ALSO, JUST A RECAP OF COUNCIL. JANUARY 14TH COUNCIL MEETING. THERE WAS A WORK SESSION WHERE COUNCIL HEARD A PRESENTATION ON A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 75 AND THE COLLIN COUNTY OUTER LOOP.
NO ACTION WAS TAKEN AT THAT MEETING. THE COUNCIL ALSO APPROVED A COMMERCIAL DRONE DELIVERY HUB AT WALMART. YOU MAY RECALL THAT AND THEN AT THE JANUARY ON JANUARY 28TH, THERE WAS A JOINT COMP PLAN UPDATE MEETING WITH COUNCIL WHERE I THINK MOST OF YOU WERE IN ATTENDANCE.
AND THEN ALSO AT THAT MEETING, COUNCIL OR DURING THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING, COUNCIL APPROVED ANNEXATION AND ZONING FOR THE ONE COMMUNITY CHURCH WHICH IS ON SOUTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY JUST NORTH OF THE OUTER LOOP.
AND IT ALSO APPROVED TABLING THE JEFFERSON FOSTER CROSSING PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO THE NEXT TO THE MARCH, I BELIEVE IT WAS MARCH 3RD MEETING OR THE THE FIRST MEETING IN MARCH.
JUST A REMINDER ABOUT UPCOMING ITEMS. FEBRUARY 6TH IS THE COMP PLAN UPDATE COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE.
THAT IS AT 6 P.M. AT RATTAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.
FEBRUARY 21ST IS THE FOCUS NORTH TEXAS 2025 CONFERENCE AT THE WESTIN GALLERIA IN DALLAS.
AT THAT MEETING KIMLEY-HORN WILL BE GOING OVER THE RESULTS FROM THE OPEN HOUSE AND THE SURVEY.
AND I FORGOT TO MENTION THAT THE THE PUBLIC SURVEY WILL BE OPEN FEBRUARY 4TH THROUGH THE 14TH.
[00:05:05]
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO DO THAT. AND THEN MARCH 3RD IS THE NEXT REGULAR P&Z MEETING.THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO CONSENT ITEMS.
[Consent Items]
AT THIS TIME, DOES ANY COMMISSIONER WISH TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? NO. NO. DOES ANY COMMISSIONER HAVE A MOTION THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO.I MOVE TO APPROVE CONSENT ITEMS NUMBERS SIX THROUGH NINE.
OKAY. I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
YES, COMMISSIONER HERMANN . YES, COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE.
YES, COMMISSIONER VOLLMER. YES. AND I AM YES, AS WELL.
MOTION PASSES. UNANIMOUS. MOVING ON TO ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.
[Items for Individual Consideration]
ITEM NUMBER TEN APPROVE A RESOLUTION REGARDING WILDFLOWER MEADOWS PRELIMINARY PLAT OWNERS WILDFLOWER ANNA, LLC. THIS ITEM IS FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, WHICH IS PART OF THE GREATER CRYSTAL PARK MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. THE AREA THAT THE WILDFLOWER MEADOWS SUBDIVISION WOULD BE IN FALLS UNDER THE MIXED USE AREA OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, WHICH ALLOWS FOR THE TOWNHOME PRODUCT.THIS FIRST REQUEST HAS TO DO WITH WHAT IN PLANNING CIRCLES IS CALLED MUSE LOTS.
IT'S WHERE THE FRONT OF THE PROPERTY IS FACING A COMMON AREA LOT RATHER THAN A PUBLIC STREET.
IT'S COMMON IN COLLIN COUNTY. I'VE PROVIDED YOU WITH THREE EXAMPLES FROM MCKINNEY, PLANO, AND ALLEN, WHERE THE LOT LEGALLY FACES AN HOA LOT INSTEAD OF THE STREET.
WE DO NOT ALLOW FOR LOTS TO FRONT ONTO A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE.
THAT'S WHY IT'S NOT FRONTING STANDRIDGE PARKWAY.
STANDRIDGE BOULEVARD OR FUTURE TAYLOR BOULEVARD OR CRYSTAL PARKWAY.
THE SECOND REQUEST IS FOR A WAIVER OF THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS TO THE SUBDIVISION.
THE SUBDIVISION WOULD REQUIRE SIX ACCESS POINTS, AND THEY'RE ONLY SHOWING FIVE, WITH ONE OF THOSE BEING A DOUBLE ENTRANCE WITH A MEDIAN IN BETWEEN. THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE WAIVERS.
DO YOU HAVE A COPY OF THEIR LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD THAT YOU CAN PUT UP ON THE SCREEN? I DON'T HAVE IT UP ON THE SCREEN IN THE SLIDE SHOW PRESENTATION.
OKAY. BUT TO PROVIDE A LETTER. YEAH. TO CONFIRM THOUGH THAT THEY'RE WANTING TO GO FROM SIX, WHICH IS MINIMAL REQUIREMENT. AND THEY'RE WANTING TO GO TO FIVE.
WE REQUIRE ONE ACCESS POINT FOR EVERY 50 LOTS.
OKAY. HOW MANY LOTS DO THEY HAVE? 252. THEY'RE ONLY OVER BY TWO.
NO. THEY HAVE 252 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, PLUS NINE COMMON AREA LOTS.
PUTS THEM AT 261. BUT IT'S BASED ON HOUSING, CORRECT? THE DWELLING UNITS. DWELLING UNITS. AREA LOTS.
ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO. IS THE DEVELOPER HERE? ANYONE HAVE QUESTIONS THAT THEY'D LIKE TO ASK THEM? ARE THEY DEVELOPING ANY PART OF CRYSTAL AND TAYLOR BOULEVARD AS PART OF THIS? SO TAYLOR BOULEVARD, THEY WILL NOT JUST BECAUSE WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT THE ALIGNMENT OF TAYLOR BOULEVARD.
THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO DEDICATE THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR STANDRIDGE TAYLOR AND FOR CRYSTAL PARKWAY.
I DO NOT KNOW OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD ABOUT CRYSTAL PARKWAY OR STANDRIDGE BOULEVARD.
THANK YOU. OKAY. I FOUND A COPY OF THE LETTER.
SO THE LETTER FROM THE ENGINEER STATES THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE FIVE DRIVES, WHICH WE FEEL WOULD BE EXCESSIVE FOR THE 252 LOTS AND WOULD NOT BE NOT BE PRACTICAL FOR THE ALIGNMENT WITH OTHER ADJACENT STREETS PROPOSED BY THE CRYSTAL PARK DEVELOPMENT, AND IS HEREBY REQUESTING A WAIVER ABOVE MENTIONED REQUIREMENT AND PROPOSING ONLY TO
[00:10:03]
PROVIDE THREE ACCESS POINTS TO THE COMMUNITY, WITH ONE BEING AN ENHANCED DIVIDED ENTRY.SO ARE THEY ASKING FOR THREE? OR ARE THEY ASKING FOR FIVE? THE REQUEST FOR THREE WAS A PREVIOUS ITERATION.
BACK WHEN THEY WERE PROPOSING TO DO DUPLEXES.
THEY'VE CHANGED IT SINCE THEN. OKAY. BECAUSE I WAS GOING OFF THE LETTER DATED JANUARY 16TH, 2025. SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE IF WE VOTE ON THIS TONIGHT, WE'RE VOTING THAT THEY AGREE TO FIVE AND NOT THREE.
IT'S A TONIGHT IS THE PLAN SHOWN ON THE SCREEN? OKAY.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE DEVELOPER? ALL MOTION TO APPROVE.
I'LL SECOND WITH THE FIVE, NOT THREE, PER THE LETTER DATED JANUARY 16TH.
AND I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN. ALL IN FAVOR, COMMISSIONER MARTIN? YES. COMMISSIONER HERMANN. YES. COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE.
YES. COMMISSIONER. VOLLMER. YES. MOTION PASSES.
UNANIMOUS. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 11. CONSIDER DISCUSS ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE REGARDING A REQUEST TO REZONE 4.9 PLUS ACRES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BUDDY HAYES BOULEVARD, 385 PLUS OR MINUS FEET, SOUTH OF ROSAMOND PARKWAY FOR A 1050 UNIT SELF-STORAGE FACILITY. OWNERS. AREA ANNA, LLC. THIS ZONING REQUEST IS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ANNEXATION CASE.
THIS PROPERTY WAS A REMAINDER TRACK AFTER THE MEADOW VISTA SUBDIVISION WAS ANNEXED AND ZONED.
THE APPLICATION IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS THAT IT BE DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS IN OUR ZONING ORDINANCE.
WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY RESPONSES WITH THIS ZONING CASE.
CAN YOU GO BACK TO THAT MAP THE LAYOUT, PLEASE? IT'S A TOWER. OKAY. I KNEW THERE WAS SOMETHING THERE.
THANK YOU. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE MAP? THANKS.
SO, WILL THEY BE BUILDING OUT ANY PART OF BUDDY HAYES, OR IS THAT PART OF THE OVERALL PROJECT THE CITY ALREADY HAS GOING ON WITH BUDDY HAYES? THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO BUILD THERE TWO LANES OF BUDDY HAYES AND DEDICATE THE RIGHT OF WAY.
AND THIS IS ALL INTERNAL STORAGE, NOT EXTERNAL STORAGE.
CORRECT. THAT'S ON THE PLAN. THERE'S THE ONE MAIN BUILDING THAT'S THREE STORIES.
AND THEN YOU HAVE THE TWO ONE STORY BUILDINGS THAT ARE THE DRIVE UP, ROLL UP GARAGES.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? QUESTIONS? IS IS THE DEVELOPER HERE? THE APPLICANT. SORRY. NO, THEY ARE HERE. IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS SPECIFICALLY FOR THEM.
AND THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM.
SO THEN I NEED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:18.
DO WE HAVE ANY CARDS OR ANYTHING ON THIS ONE? OKAY.
THEN I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:18 AND CONFINE ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION.
[00:15:01]
NOT NECESSARILY WHAT'S GOING IN THERE, BUT WE DO KNOW HOW THIS IS GOING TO BUILD OUT AS WELL AS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ROSAMOND.SO THAT'S ALL GOING TO BE ZONED AS COMMERCIAL.
AND THEN I THINK IT HAS SOME RESTAURANTS THAT WILL GO ACROSS THE FRONT ON BOTH.
AND THERE'S THAT CREEK RUNNING LOOKS LIKE ALONG THE BACK. SO IT'S A GOOD SEPARATION I THINK.
LAUREN IS THE LAND LOCATED TO THE NORTH ON ROSAMOND IS THAT PART OF THE WOODS DEVELOPMENT OR IS THAT SEPARATED? THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH IS PART OF THE WOODS AT LINDSEY.
IT'S THE COMMERCIAL PORTION AS WELL AS A PORTION OF THE HOA LOT, AND IT HAS A VERY LARGE ATMOS TRANSMISSION LINE THAT GOES THROUGH ALONG THE BORDER OF THE PROPERTY.
DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR ITEM NUMBER 11? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
DO WE NEED TO SAY WITH THOSE CONDITIONS BASED ON THAT? YES. ARE YOU DOING IT BASED ON THE CONDITIONS WITH THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT? THANK YOU. DO I HAVE A SECOND? HOLD ON. IS THE MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE CONDITIONS. TO APPROVE BASED ON.
OKAY, I'LL SECOND THAT. SO I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER HERMANNN.
ALL IN FAVOR? COMMISSIONER MARTIN? YES. COMMISSIONER HERMANN.
YES. COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE. YES. COMMISSIONER VOLLMER.
YES, I AM A YES AS WELL. MOTION PASSES. UNANIMOUS.
MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 12. CONSIDER DISCUSS ACTION ON A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE PUBLIC STORAGE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN OWNERS AREA ANNA, LLC. THIS ITEM IS A COMPANION ITEM TO THE PREVIOUS ZONING CASE.
I'LL MOTION TO APPROVE. I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY MYSELF AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
ALL IN FAVOR? COMMISSIONER MARTIN? YES. COMMISSIONER HERMANN.
YES. COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE. YES. COMMISSIONER VOLLMER.
YES. MOTION PASSES. UNANIMOUS. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 13.
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST WHITE STREET.
95 PLUS OR MINUS FEET, EAST OF VICTORIA FALLS DRIVE.
THIS IS A ZONED PLAN DEVELOPMENT. REGIONAL COMMERCIAL OWNER IS GREEN LIGHT STUDIO, LLC.
THIS ITEM THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR AUTO, A LIGHT AUTO REPAIR ON THE VICTORIA FALLS SUBDIVISION ADJACENT TO TEXAS BANK AND IN FRONT OF THE VICTORIA FALLS SHOPPING CENTER.
IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
THE SITE SHALL DEVELOP IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE PLAN.
THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT AND WE DID RECEIVE ONE RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION.
AND THIS ONE I HAVE TO OPEN UP FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TOO. OKAY.
AT THIS TIME, WE'LL OPEN UP FOR PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:22 P.M..
DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS ON THIS ITEM? OKAY.
WITH THAT BEING SAID, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:22 P.M..
DOES ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I JUST MY ONLY QUESTION ISN'T ABOUT THE ACTUAL THING.
BUT WHEN WE MAKE THE RECOMMENDATIONS DO WE HAVE TO READ THIS IN TOTALITY, OR CAN WE SAY WHAT THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS? THE QUESTION IS WHETHER YOU CAN PLACE CONDITIONS OR RECOMMEND CONDITIONS.
[00:20:05]
SO IF WE ARE GOING TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON THIS, IT'S GOT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS THAT ARE RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.DO WE NEED TO READ THOSE INTO THE RECORD WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OR THE MOTION, OR IS JUST REFERENCING THEM SUFFICIENT? WELL, YOU SHOULD YOU CAN DO IT BY REFERENCE, ESPECIALLY IF THERE'S A WRITTEN ORDINANCE PROPOSED ORDINANCE.
ANYBODY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? IS THE APPLICANT HERE? THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT. WOULD THEY LIKE TO TALK? YOU DON'T HAVE TO.
PRETTY SELF-EXPLANATORY. OKAY. WE'LL SAVE YOU YOUR SPEECH TONIGHT.
OKAY. DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 13? I'LL MAKE A MOTION WE APPROVE BASED ON FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
SO SITE SHALL DEVELOP IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SHOWING EXHIBIT B OF THE PACKET.
TWO SITES SHALL DEVELOP IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FACADE PLAN SHOWN IN EXHIBIT C, AND THREE SITES SHALL DEVELOP IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS AND ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 9.04. 031D AS IN DELTA AS FOLLOWS AUTO REPAIR LIGHT.
I WILL. GO AHEAD. I'LL GET A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER HERMANN.
I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR, COMMISSIONER MARTIN? YES. COMMISSIONER HERMANN. YES. COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE.
YES. COMMISSIONER VOLLMER. YES. I'M A YES. MOTION PASSES.
UNANIMOUS. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 14. CONSIDER DISCUSS ACTION ON A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE VICTORIA FALLS CENTER ADDITION. BLOCK A. LOT TWO PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN.
OWNER IS GREEN LIGHT STUDIO. SO THIS ONE IS CONTINGENT ON THE OTHER ONE AS WELL.
CORRECT. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. I'LL SECOND.
MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER WALDEN. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
ALL IN FAVOR? COMMISSIONER MARTIN? YES. COMMISSIONER HERMANN.
YES. COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE. YES. COMMISSIONER VOLLMER.
YES. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUS. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 15.
CONSIDER. DISCUSS ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE REGARDING A REQUEST TO ZONE 1,127.6 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE OF EAST ROSAMOND PARKWAY, 980FT EAST OF NORTH LEONARD AVENUE, TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AGRICULTURAL, MIXED USE, INDUSTRIAL AND CONFORMANCE WITH A PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
OWNER IS THE TELLUS TEXAS LLC. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.
THE APPLICANT AGAIN IS REQUESTING TO ANNEX AND ZONE PROPERTY FOR A MIXED USE PLAN DEVELOPMENT.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE FIVE DIFFERENT ZONES, ALL WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT. SO ZONE ONE WILL CONTAIN AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN, ZONE ONE CONTAINS A MAXIMUM OF 3000 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS THAT CONTAIN THAT COULD CONTAIN A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL TYPES FROM SINGLE FAMILY TO MULTI-FAMILY. ZONE TWO IS THE MULTIFAMILY FLEX ZONE, WITH THE ABILITY TO INCLUDE A MAXIMUM OF 160 SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING UNITS AND OR A MAXIMUM OF 200 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS.
ZONES 4A, B AND C ARE MULTI-USE TRACKS AND MAY CONTAIN A MIX OF MULTIFAMILY, COMMERCIAL, LIGHT, INDUSTRIAL AND AGRICULTURAL USES AND ZONE FIVE I'M SORRY ZONE FOUR IS INCLUDED IN THE ANNEXATION AND ZONING REQUEST, BUT WILL ACTUALLY BE DEVELOPED BY ANOTHER DEVELOPER.
LASTLY, ZONE FIVE WILL CONTAIN A WORKING FARM AND COMMERCIAL USES RELATED TO THAT FARM.
ZONE FIVE IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT THAT WILL OCCUR ON ZONE ONE.
THE ANNEXATION REQUEST, AGAIN, IS FOR ALL OF THE PROPERTY AS WELL AS THE ZONING.
[00:25:10]
AN AGRICULTURAL USE TO IT, AN AGRICULTURAL COMPONENT, ALONG WITH COMMERCIAL USES THAT ARE RELATED TO THAT RESIDENTIAL USE.THE DEVELOPMENT WILL PROVIDE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL USES AS WELL, AND VARIOUS COMMERCIAL USES. STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER.
AT THIS TIME I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:29 P.M..
DOES ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? THEY'RE HERE, BUT ONLY IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS.
OKAY. ON THAT NOTE, DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I DON'T KNOW WHO THE BEST PERSON TO ANSWER THIS BECAUSE I'M JUST TO CLARIFY ZONE TWO, IT CAN BE EITHER OR OR IT CAN BE A MIX OF BOTH SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY. IT SAYS THEY CAN SWITCH BETWEEN.
YES. ZONE TWO CAN INCLUDE BOTH. SO IT CAN BE SINGLE FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY.
IT CAN. IT CAN INCLUDE BOTH OF THOSE USES.
AND THEY'LL BE BACK BEFORE US AT SOME POINT WITH SPECIFIC LAYOUTS PLANS CORRECT.
ALSO ON THIS AGENDA RIGHT AFTER THIS ITEM IS THERE IS THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN FOR, I MEAN, PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PHASE ONE. ARE THERE ANY SPEAKER CARDS FOR THIS ITEM? NO. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:30 P.M.
AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF.
EVERYTHING THAT I'M SEEING IS THE SAME THING THAT THEY PRESENTED LAST TIME WHEN THEY WENT.
LOOKS LIKE WHAT WE SAW BEFORE SO. RIGHT. IS THERE A MOTION ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 15? MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. THERE'S NO CONDITIONS RIGHT? CORRECT. I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HERMANN.
ALL IN FAVOR? COMMISSIONER MARTIN. YES. COMMISSIONER HERMANN.
YES. COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE. YES. COMMISSIONER VOLLMER.
YES. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUS. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 16.
CONSIDER DISCUSS ACTION ON A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE SHERLEY FARMS PHASE ONE PLAT.
OWNERS TELLUS TEXAS , LLC. THIS IS THEIR PLAT FOR PHASE ONE.
THOSE CONTINGENT UPON ITEM 15. YES. THAT'S CORRECT.
OKAY. AND HERE IS THE PLAT. PHASE ONE INCLUDES 423 LOTS OF VARIOUS RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZES WHICH IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT THEY WERE, THAT THEY ENTERED INTO.
AND STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE PLAT. OKAY. AT THIS TIME, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:32 P.M.. DOES ANY COMMISSIONER HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? NO. I THINK I'D MAKE A COMMENT. IT'S NICE TO SEE SOME 60 FOOT AND SOMETIMES LARGER LOTS COMING UP IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN OUR CITY FOR A WHILE, SO APPRECIATE THAT. OKAY, SO DO WE HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ARE THERE ANY SPEAKER CARDS FOR THE PLAT? I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:33 P.M.
AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF. DO WE HAVE A MOTION FROM ANY COMMISSIONER ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 16? MOTION TO APPROVE. I'LL SPLIT THE DIFFERENCE.
COMMISSIONER MARTIN. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER VOLLMER, LONGMIRE SORRY. ALL IN FAVOR? COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
YES. COMMISSIONER HERMANN. YES. COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE.
YES. COMMISSIONER VOLLMER. YES. I AM A YES AS WELL.
[00:30:01]
MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUS. DO WE HAVE ANY FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS THAT WE'D LIKE TO DISCUSS AT THIS TIME? NO. OKAY. IF THAT'S ALL DONE, I'LL MOVE.I'LL MOTION TO ADJOURN. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? COMMISSIONER MARTIN. YES. COMMISSIONER HERMANN.
YES. COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE. YES. COMMISSIONER.
VOLLMER. YES. OKAY. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUS MEETING WILL BE ADJOURNED AT 6:34 P.M..
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.