[00:00:02]
[1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum.]
WELCOME TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND APOLOGIZE IN ADVANCE, YOU GUYS.
I'M SICK, SO EXCUSE THE RASPY MAN VOICE THAT I'M ROCKING TODAY.
TODAY WE ARE MISSING COMMISSIONER NALICK AND COMMISSIONER BLANSETT.
WE'RE GOING TO START WITH THE INVOCATION AND THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
PLEASE ALL RISE FOR THE INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
GRACIOUS AND LOVING GOD, WE COME BEFORE YOU WITH HUMBLE HEARTS AS WE BEGIN TONIGHT.
WE ASK FOR YOUR WISDOM AND GUIDANCE IN DISCERNMENT.
GRANT US THE ABILITY TO LISTEN WITH OPEN MINDS SO THAT WE MAY SERVE OUR COMMUNITY WITH INTEGRITY.
MAY OUR ACTIONS ALWAYS REFLECT YOUR WILL FOR PEACE.
BLESS OUR CITY, ITS LEADERS, AND ITS CITIZENS.
WE'LL MOVE ON TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS.
EACH PERSON WILL BE ALLOWED UP TO THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AT THIS MEETING ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA, OTHER THAN TO MAKE STATEMENTS OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO A NEIGHBOR'S INQUIRY, OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY AND RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY.
DO YOU HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS? NO. OKAY.
DO WE HAVE A DIRECTOR'S REPORT TO GO THROUGH TODAY? YES. OKAY.
I JUST HAVE A COUPLE OF THINGS.
THIS IS, SO IT LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE ONE SPEAKER CARD.
HELLO. MY NAME IS HUGH OROZCO.
ADDRESS IS 3104 CREEK MEADOW DRIVE IN ANNA, TEXAS.
THIS ISN'T JUST A PERSONAL APPEAL.
IT'S A CHANCE TO EMBRACE GROWTH AND DIVERSITY IN OUR BELOVED CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS.
MY GRANDFATHER SERVED BRAVELY AND WAS IN PRISON.
THE REZONING CASE, REZONING, PUBLIC HEARINGS LATER IN THE MEETING.
WE'LL HAVE YOU COME BACK UP WHEN WE GET TO THAT ITEM ON THE AGENDA FOR THAT.
[4. Reports]
THANK YOU CHAIR.I JUST WANT TO GO OVER A COUPLE ITEMS FROM CITY COUNCIL BACK IN SEPTEMBER.
AT THE SEPTEMBER 10TH MEETING, COUNCIL APPROVED ENTERING INTO A SERVICES CONTRACT WITH KIMLEY-HORN FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, WHICH YOU ALL ARE AWARE OF.
AND THEN AT ITS SEPTEMBER 24TH MEETING, COUNCIL APPROVED STAFF ENTERING INTO AN AMENDMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH NEXT METRO COMMUNITIES AS WELL AS NRP GROUP TO ALLOW THEM ADDITIONAL TIME WITHIN THEIR PROJECT SCHEDULE. ADDITIONALLY, COUNCILMAN TOTTEN SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO THE COUNCIL TO SET A FUTURE AGENDA ITEM TO DISCUSS CONCERNS THAT HE HAS REGARDING THE CITY'S TREE PRESERVATION AND TREE REQUIREMENTS.
SO I'M SURE WE WILL BE SEEING THAT AGAIN ON THE COUNCIL'S AGENDA AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE.
[00:05:08]
STATE CONFERENCE.AND, ALAN, SO IF YOU HAVE SIGNED UP FOR THAT THAT IS WEDNESDAY.
THURSDAY, REALLY THURSDAY AND FRIDAY.
AND THAT AGENDA IS ONLINE RIGHT NOW.
AND UNFORTUNATELY, ALL OF THE MOBILE TOURS HAVE SOLD OUT.
SO IF YOU'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO DOING THAT, IT'S, IT'S TOO LATE TO, TO GET A TICKET FOR THAT.
BUT IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER THEM.
[Consent Items]
DOES ANY COMMISSIONER WISH TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AT THIS TIME? NO. OKAY.DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR CONSENT ITEMS? SIX THROUGH EIGHT. A MOTION TO APPROVE.
A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN AND I HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER HERMAN.
ALL IN FAVOR? . MOTION PASSES.
UNANIMOUS. MOVING ON TO ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION, CONSIDER.
[Items for Individual Consideration]
DISCUSS. ACTION ON THE ROSEMONT CROSSING.NORTHEAST CORNER. ADDITION BLOCK A, LOTS 1-17.
PRELIMINARY PLAT OWNER ANNA 18 LLC, MJ ADAMS LIMITED.
COMMISSION. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION, AS THERE HAVE BEEN CHANGES THAT THEY CAN CHANGES THAT DID NOT CONFORM WITH THE APPROVED PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN.
A REVISED PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN WILL BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH UPDATED PRELIMINARY PLAT.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THE COMMISSION APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION.
OKAY. SO AT THIS TIME, WE'LL DO A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION.
MAKE A MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE THE EXTENSION.
OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER LONGMIRE.
ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES. UNANIMOUS.
LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH POWELL PARKWAY 530 PLUS OR MINUS FEET SOUTH OF FERN STREET.
SORRY IF I MISPRONOUNCED YOUR LAST NAME.
I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:08 P.M.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH POWELL PARKWAY, ACROSS FROM THE MOBILE HOME PARK.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REUSE THE EXISTING HOUSE AS A RESTAURANT.
THEY PROVIDED THIS CONCEPT PLAN, SHOWING HOW THEY COULD DEVELOP THE PROPERTY.
IF THE REQUEST IS APPROVED, THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK THROUGH WITH A SITE PLAN.
THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF THE PROPERTY.
YOU CAN SEE THE HOUSE THAT'S EXISTING AND THEN THE CURRENT ZONING IS SF-1, WHICH IS OUR OLDER SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT, AND TO THE SOUTH THE PROPERTY IS ZONED C-1 COMMERCIAL, WHICH IS OUR LOCAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
THE OTHER PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND TO THE EAST ARE ALSO SF-1.
THE ZONING IS FOR THE MOBILE HOME PARK AS WELL AS SOME PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.
FOR FURTHER DETAIL WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN, IT IDENTIFIES THIS AREA AS IN-TOWN.
RESIDENTIAL. CONVERSION OF THE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME INTO A COMMERCIAL USE IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN, ITS CALL FOR IN-TOWN RESIDENTIAL.
THE IN-TOWN RESIDENTIAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDES ONLY RESIDENTIAL USES, AS WELL AS GOVERNMENT USES OF THE PROPERTY.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS FOR DENIAL.
[00:10:06]
DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? PLEASE COME DOWN AND STATE YOUR FIRST AND LAST NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.HELLO, EVERYONE. MY NAME IS HUGH OROSCO FOR PROPERTY ADDRESS 910 NORTH POWELL PARKWAY.
THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TONIGHT AGAIN.
THIS ISN'T JUST A PERSONAL APPEAL.
IT'S A CHANCE TO EMBRACE GROWTH AND DIVERSITY IN OUR BELOVED CITY OF ANNA, TEXAS.
MY GRANDFATHER SERVED BRAVELY AND WAS IMPRISONED FOR FIGHTING TO KEEP OUR FREEDOM.
OUR JOURNEY HAS NOT BEEN EASY, BUT IT HAS SHAPED WHO WE ARE AND FUELED MY DAD'S UNWAVERING DETERMINATION TO PURSUE HIS DREAMS. AFTER 30 YEARS OF BEING A HIBACHI CHEF UNDER OTHER RESTAURANT OWNERS, HE HAS FINALLY TAKEN THE LEAP TO INVEST HIS LIFE SAVINGS INTO HIS PASSION HIS DREAM OF OWNING HIS OWN RESTAURANT. HIS TALENTS AND CHARISMA HAVE MADE HIM A FAN FAVORITE CHEF, EVEN CATCHING THE ATTENTION OF WWE SUPERSTARS TRIPLE H, WHO SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED MY DAD TO BE HIS CHEF FOR YEARS WHEN WE LIVED IN CONNECTICUT.
AS WE LOOK AROUND ANNA, WE SEE A CITY EVOLVING AND ATTRACTING FAMILIES FROM DIVERSE BACKGROUNDS.
THIS GROWTH PRESENTS A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY TO ENRICH OUR LOCAL CULTURE AND CULINARY LANDSCAPE BY ALLOWING MY DAD'S HIBACHI RESTAURANT TO OPERATE IN A COMMERCIAL ZONE, WE CAN INTRODUCE A NEW CULINARY EXPERIENCE THAT REFLECTS THE DIVERSITY OF OUR COMMUNITY.
HIBACHI CUISINE IS MORE THAN JUST DELICIOUS FOOD.
SUPPORTING DIVERSE RESTAURANTS LIKE MY DAD'S CONTRIBUTES TO ANNA'S ECONOMIC VITALITY.
RESTAURANTS CREATE JOBS, SUPPORT LOCAL SUPPLIERS, AND BOOST TOURISM.
DIVERSITY IN OUR CULTURE OFFERS OFFERING REFLECTS THE RICH TAPESTRY OF OUR COMMUNITY.
IT PROMOTES UNDERSTANDING AND APPRECIATING THE DIFFERENT CULTURES BY REZONING THIS.
IN CONCLUSION, I URGE YOU TO CONSIDER THE POSITIVE IMPACT OF THIS REZONING.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONSIDERATION.
DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? YES, SIR.
THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? DO YOU HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS ON THIS ITEM? NO. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:14 P.M.
AND CAN FIND COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF.
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE RESIDENTIAL GOING TO COMMERCIAL AND BEING RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO ANOTHER RESIDENTIAL HOME? I THINK THAT'S MY QUESTION.
THE SECOND HOUSE DOESN'T MOVE.
THAT'S CORRECT. IT WILL STAY AS RESIDENTIAL.
THE ONE TO THE LEFT IF YOU'RE FACING THE HOME.
CORRECT IN THE DRAWING HAS THE PARKING LOT RUNNING RIGHT BETWEEN THOSE TWO HOUSES.
THE DRAWING THAT'S IN THE PLANS.
LAUREN, IS THIS DRAWING JUST KIND OF A PRELIMINARY SKETCH UP OF WHAT IT WAS GOING TO BE.
BECAUSE I BELIEVE YOU STATED EARLIER THAT THEY WOULD SUBMIT FORMALLY IF APPROVED.
I DID WORK WITH THEM TO BRING IT UP TO CODE, ALTHOUGH THE PARKING LOT DOES NEED SOME ADJUSTMENTS.
SO IS THE PARKING SPACES AN ACCURATE COUNT BASED ON HOW MANY PEOPLE THEY CAN HOLD INSIDE THE RESTAURANT ONCE IT'S FULLY DEVELOPED? IT IS. WHAT IS ON THE RIGHT, AS WELL AS TWO ON THE SIDE AND AN ADDITIONAL TEN IN THE BACK.
THE TEN IN THE BACK IS THE ONE THAT WOULD NEED TO BE EDITED, SO THEY CAN ONLY HOLD 14 CARS AT A GIVEN TIME, PLUS HANDICAP 20.
[00:15:10]
WHEN YOU SAY EDITED THE ONES IN THE BACK, WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU DON'T ALLOW FOR DEAD END PARKING MORE THAN SIX SPACES.YOU KNOW, WE TYPICALLY ALLOW, REQUIRE A HIGHER PLANE WHEN WE HAVE COMMERCIAL.
AND MANAGING WORKFLOW IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO.
AND THAT'S WHAT YOU SEE THERE.
THE ISSUE WITH THAT, AND THAT SETUP IS THAT YOU CAN SEE THE OTHER ACCESS, YOU REQUIRE TWO ACCESS POINTS OFF OF HIGHWAY FIVE.
THE ISSUE THERE IS THAT THEY'RE USING THE OTHER A LOT, BUT THEY DON'T OWN FOR THAT SECONDARY ACCESS.
AND SO THEY WOULD NEED TO COME INTO SOME TYPE OF AGREEMENT WITH THAT PROPERTY OWNER TO USE LIKE AN EASEMENT FOR US TO HAVE ACCESS OFF OF THAT PROPERTY.
THE OTHER THING IS THAT BECAUSE THIS IS A STATE HIGHWAY OR A STATE ROAD IT WOULD BE TEXAS APPROVAL TO HAVE TWO ACCESS POINTS ON THEIR PROPERTY.
CHALLENGING BECAUSE PRESCOTT HAS THEY HAVE LANES OR, YOU KNOW, REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN DRIVEWAYS.
SO THOSE ARE SOME OF THE CHALLENGES WITH THIS.
I JUST WANT TO KNOW, DOES THIS LAYOUT.
MEET THE CURRENT SETBACK REQUIREMENTS WITH THAT FIRE LANE? YEAH. LIKE PROPERTY SETBACKS? YES. THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AND THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
CORRECT. IS THAT CORRECT? YOU'RE RIGHT. OKAY.
SO, IT WOULD ALSO BE SCREENING [INAUDIBLE] THE MARKOV PROPERTY IS MOSTLY A RESIDENTIAL STATE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE SOME TYPE OF SCREENING PROPERTY.
WE HAVE LETTERS OF OPPOSITION FROM THE NEIGHBORS.
THE THREE LETTERS RECEIVED WERE ALL ALONG REAGAN'S LAWN.
CAN YOU PULL BACK UP THE MAP THAT SHOWS THE ZONING ADJACENT? THANKS. SEE, I'M NOT TOTALLY OPPOSED TO IT BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT C-1 TO THE SOUTH AND YOU CAN.
YEAH, LIKE YOU CAN THROW UP A MASONRY WALL AND SCREEN THAT TO THE RESIDENTIAL TO THE NORTH.
LOOK, IT'S GOING TO GET EXPANDED.
IT KIND OF MAKES MORE SENSE FOR COMMERCIAL RATHER THAN RESIDENTIAL ALONG THERE, BUT WITH IT BEING THAT NARROW, LIKE SHE WAS SAYING, THE CURB CUTS. YOU GOT TO GET AN ACCESS AGREEMENT FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER FOR THE FIRE LANE.
THAT MAKES IT TOUGH TO APPROVE WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT'S GOING TO BE NEXT DOOR RIGHT NOW.
I AGREE WITH THAT TOO, BECAUSE THE C-1 IS RIGHT BELOW IT.
YOU KNOW, WE HAVE THE BREWERY.
WE HAVE THINGS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO DEVELOP TO THRIVE, OUR DOWNTOWN AREA.
YOU JUST HAVE A LOT OF RESIDENTIAL HOMES.
YOU HAVE THE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND THINGS LIKE THAT OFF OF FIVE.
IT IS A TRICKY SITE TO TRY TO KEEP COMPLIANT.
THEY HAVE A LOT OF ADVERSITY AND HURDLES TO GO THROUGH TO GET THERE.
THE ONLY THING I CAN THINK OF, LAUREN, IS I KNOW WE CAN BASE WE CAN APPROVE BASED ON CONDITIONS TO IT, LIKE APPROVE THE ZONING, BUT I DON'T REALLY KNOW HOW WE'D APPROVE IT FOR THEM TO BE ABLE TO MAYBE GET IN TALKS WITH THE OTHER THE LANDOWNER TO THE RIGHT OF THEM.
I MEAN, AT THIS POINT, WELL, CAN WE ASK THE APPLICANT A QUESTION? DO YOU MIND? SEEING THIS AND HEARING THE CONVERSATION.
RIGHT. THE DRIVEWAY IS NOT GOING TO BE ON YOUR PROPERTY.
YOU'D HAVE TO ACQUIRE LAND OR ACCESS.
YOU HAVE THE UPHILL BATTLE OF HIGHWAY FIVE WITH TXDOT.
[00:20:01]
HAVE YOU ENGAGED IN ANY OF THOSE CONVERSATIONS? DO YOU KNOW WHO OWNS THE LAND TO THE SOUTH? IN TERMS OF TXDOT? NOT YET, BUT WE'VE ACTUALLY BEEN TRYING TO LOCATE THE OWNERS OF THE OTHER LOT TO BE IN TALKS WITH THEM.IT'S ACTUALLY AN INVESTOR THAT OWNS IT.
HAVE YOU CONSIDERED WAITING TIMING WISE UNTIL YOU KNOW IF IT'S A POSSIBILITY OR NOT? WE HAVE NOT CONSIDERED WAITING.
IT'S BEEN A LIFELONG DREAM OF MY DAD'S, AND WHEN WE WERE LOOKING AT COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, THE ONES THAT WERE ALREADY ZONED COMMERCIAL WERE A BIT TOO EXPENSIVE FOR, YOU KNOW, HIS LIFE SAVINGS AND WHAT WE HAD WITH LIQUID.
SO WE REALLY WANTED TO TRY TO MAKE THIS WORK.
AND WE'RE UP FOR THE CHALLENGE.
WE'RE UP TO ALL OF THE ADVERSITY THAT WE'LL FACE.
WE HAVE THE BEST INTENTIONS OF TRULY GROWING ANNA AND GROWING WITH ANNA.
SO WE'RE HOPING THAT THE ONES THAT WE INTERACT WITH ARE ON THE SAME PAGE.
BUT NO, WE HAVE NOT CONSIDERED WAITING AS OF NOW.
IF ANYTHING, WE'RE HOPING TO START THE CHANGE.
LAUREN, CAN YOU GIVE US SOME EXAMPLES OF HOW WE COULD POSSIBLY APPROVE IT, BUT WITH CONTINGENT OPTIONS ATTACHED TO IT OR STEPHANIE, YOU'RE NOT PREPARED TO.
IF WE TABLED IT FOR THE NEXT ONE, WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO DO THAT? CAN I ASK YOUR BASIS FOR THAT BECAUSE I'M NOT OPPOSED TO ZONING IT AND REZONING IT AS COMMERCIAL YET.
BUT I DON'T FLAT OUT WANT TO COME IN AND DENY THEM EITHER AND NOT WANT TO GO TO COMMERCIAL.
IF SOME MORE RESEARCH IS DONE TO THE OWNER ON THE SOUTH.
THEN IT'S A BIG BENEFIT BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT TWO PLOTS OF LAND RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER THAT ARE WANTING TO GO COMMERCIAL, AND IT HELPS OUT THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN THAT YOU ALL ARE ALREADY TRYING TO SET UP. ANYWAY.
WELL, I WILL SAY THAT THIS IS A TRADE FREE ZONE, AND SO THEY JUST HAVE TO DO IT FOR, YOU KNOW, IF COUNCIL IS TO APPROVE THIS REZONING, THEN THEY WOULDN'T HAVE THE FUNDING FOR THIS.
SO UNLIKE A PD WHERE YOU AND, YOU KNOW, CONDITION IT FOR DIFFERENT THINGS OR ETHNICITY, FOR EXAMPLE.
WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT A REZONE HERE.
I THINK THE SITE PLAN IS, IS GOOD AND THAT HELPS US KIND OF THEY'VE RUN SOME PRELIMINARY.
SO OKAY, MAYBE THIS COULD WORK.
BUT WE'RE NOT APPROVING THE SITE PLAN.
RIGHT. WE'RE JUST APPROVING A REZONE SO WE COULD REZONE IT.
AND THEN THEY GOT TO COME BACK WITH A SITE PLAN SUBMITTED AND IT'S GOING TO HAVE TO CONFORM.
SO YEAH, I WOULD I'D BE IN SUPPORT OF A REZONE AND THEN THEY'D NEED TO FIGURE IT OUT.
YOU KNOW, I'D BE IN SUPPORT OF RECOMMENDING A REZONE.
I'LL JUST SAY I'M NOT GOING TO GET THERE.
I'D BE FINE WITH THEM TABLING IT AND COMING BACK.
I THINK IF THEY HAD IT MORE WORKED OUT, I THINK THEY HAVE TOO MANY HURDLES.
AND THEN THAT ACCESS POINT OFF FIVE RIGHT NOW, I THINK THE CONGESTION AND THE TRAFFIC WE ALREADY HAVE IN THE ISSUES WITH ACCIDENTS, LIKE IT JUST NEEDS TO BE FARTHER DOWN THE ROAD IN A PLAN. ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE THE LAND NECESSARY TO PUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN FOR IT.
I AGREE WITH COMMISSIONER VOLIN.
I THINK THIS IS JUST PREMATURE AT THIS STAGE IN PLANNING, AND THAT THERE HAS TO BE A LOT MORE THINGS ANSWERED, BECAUSE IF WE DO APPROVE IT FOR REZONE AND THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO GET THESE THINGS TOGETHER, THEN IT IS REZONED FOR SOMETHING LATER THAT WE ARE NOT AWARE OF.
I HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH THE PROPERTY BEING COMMERCIAL.
I JUST DON'T THINK THIS WORKS THE WAY THAT THEY'RE DOING IT.
AND SO, I WOULDN'T BE SUPPORTIVE PASSING IT.
[00:25:03]
I'D BE FINE WITH THEM TAKING IT BACK AND TRYING TO COME WITH MORE PLANS OR MORE HOW TO AND WORKING WITH TXDOT, WORKING WITH THE LAND AROUND TO GET THE RIGHT ROADWAYS, INFRASTRUCTURE, EXITS, PARKING LOT, ALL THAT DONE.BUT I WOULDN'T GIVE IT TO HIM BEFORE THAT.
THAT'S ALONG THE SAME THING I WAS TRYING TO SAY EARLIER.
IS THERE SOME WAY THAT WE CAN PRESENT IT THAT WAY OTHER THAN JUST FLAT DENIAL? BUT I'M BEING, WHAT I'M HEARING FROM STEPHANIE AND LAUREN IS NO, WE JUST OWN IT NOW.
APPROVE IT OR DON'T APPROVE IT.
YES. WE WILL BE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OR NOT.
AND THIS IS IN A SENSE, IT'S HARD TO RECOMMEND CONDITIONS BECAUSE OF THIS SITUATION.
SO REALLY, YOU'RE LOOKING AT EITHER RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OR RECOMMENDATION, BUT IF WE RECOMMEND DENIAL TONIGHT, WHEN'S THE NEXT TIME THAT THEY CAN COME IN FRONT OF US? AND GO. THIS IS NOT.
AND THEN WHEN COULD THEY COME BACK IF CITY COUNCIL DENIES IT? IT'S SIX MONTHS BEFORE THEY COULD REAPPLY FOR THE SAME ZONING REQUEST.
IF THEY WERE TO WORK OUT SOMETHING WITH THE NEIGHBORS TO THE SOUTH AND CHANGE IT, DOES THAT SHORTEN THE TIME FRAME FOR THEM, OR DOES IT STAY SIX MONTHS SINCE IT'S A STRAIGHT CHANGE? DO YOU MEAN IF THE NEIGHBOR TO THE SOUTH WAS ALSO TO APPLY FOR A REZONING? YEAH, IF THEY CAME IN JOINTLY, SINCE IT'S GOING TO BE PART OF THAT PROPERTY.
I WOULD HAVE TO CONFIRM WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY.
THE REQUEST HAS TO BE DIFFERENT ENOUGH TO ALLOW THEM TO COME BACK TO US.
THE APPLICANT IS THE CURRENT OWNER OF THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY.
ANY MORE QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? SO IF WE WERE TO GIVE THEM THE OPTION TO PULL IT OFF AND ADDRESS WHAT WE'RE ASKING ABOUT, DO THEY STILL HAVE TO WAIT SIX MONTHS OR WOULD IT STILL MOVE ALONG IN THE PROCESS? IS THERE NO WAY FOR THEM TO JUST PULL IT OUT NOW THAT WE'VE STARTED? BECAUSE WE'RE ALREADY HEARING THEY CAN'T PULL IT BACK.
YEP. SO THEY CAN'T PULL IT OFF AND THEN COME BACK WITH A CHANGE.
I HAVE A MOTION FOR DENIAL FROM COMMISSIONER VOLLMER AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
ALL IN FAVOR? . MOTION'S GOING TO PASS 3 TO 2.
THAT'LL BRING US TO THE CONCLUSION OF THIS MEETING.
DO I HAVE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? I'LL MOTION.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER VOLLMER.
ALL IN FAVOR? I'LL ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 6:29 P.M.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.