[00:00:01]
WELCOME EVERYONE TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING FOR MONDAY, JUNE 3RD, 2024.
[1. Call to Order, Roll Call, and Establishment of Quorum]
WE HAVE WE ARE MISSING COMMISSIONER NYLEC AND WE HAVE A NEW COMMISSIONER, JOSH VOLLMER.HE'S NEW TO P&Z BUT NOT NEW TO THE CITY HE WAS ON CITY COUNCIL AND CDCEDC.
PLEASE STAND FOR THE INVOCATION.
LET'S PRAY. FATHER, THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO GATHER THIS EVENING.
FATHER, I PRAY FOR ALL OF THOSE THAT WERE AFFECTED BY THE RECENT STORMS IN THE AREA.
PRAY FOR. PRAY FOR THOSE THAT LOST LOVED ONES AND WERE INJURED.
AND PRAY THOSE THAT ARE TRYING TO RECOVER.
FATHER, THANK YOU FOR THOSE THAT ARE HELPING.
FATHER THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR BLESSINGS THAT YOU PROVIDE US.
THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER BLANSETT.
EACH PERSON WILL BE ALLOWED THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.
NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AT THIS MEETING ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA, OTHER THAN TO MAKE STATEMENTS OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO A NEIGHBOR'S INQUIRY, OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO AN INQUIRY.
DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS? NO. I WILL MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT ITEMS.
[Consent Items]
DOES ANY COMMISSIONER WISH TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT? NO. IS THERE A MOTION FOR CONSENT? ITEMS 5 THROUGH 10.I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ON TO ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.
[Items for Individual Consideration]
CONSIDER DISCUSS ACTION REGARDING THE FAMILY TIME AWAY PLACE.FINAL PLAT APPLICANT FAMILY TIME AWAY LLC.
MRS. MECKE ITEM BEFORE YOU IS A REPLAT FOR AN EXISTING PROPERTY.
IT IS LOCATED IN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION ALSO KNOWN AS THE ETJ.
THIS IS THE LAYOUT THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING AS PART OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS.
AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE PLAT, THE YELLOW LINE HERE IS THE 50 FOOT OR 25FT OF THE 50 FOOT EASEMENT THAT'S ON THEIR PROPERTIES AND THEN THE BUILDING SETBACK IS 25FT.
COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? IS THERE A MOTION ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 11? A MOTION TO APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 11.
I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BLANCHETT TO APPROVE.
IS THERE A SECOND, I SECOND AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN? ALL IN FAVOR, MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
CONSIDER. DISCUSS ACTION ON A REQUEST TO AMEND THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
PLACE TYPE IN THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN OF THE ANNA 2050 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANNEX AND ZONE 20 OR 2.5 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES AND REZONE 20.5 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES.
APPLICANT IS ANNA PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT LLC.
I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:05 P.M.
[00:05:01]
IT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF THE CURRENT PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING.THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO HAVE A MULTIFAMILY AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.
THE PREFERRED SCENARIO DIAGRAM CALLS FOR ESTATE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL.
THE ZONING REQUEST IS TO REZONE FROM THE CURRENT ZONING OF SFA TO MULTIFAMILY AND C2 WITHOUT ANY STIPULATIONS, CHANGING ANY OF THE REGULATIONS.
AND IF THE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS APPROVED, IT IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THAT.
BUT I NEED A RECOMMENDATION BOTH FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FOR THE ZONING.
DOES ANY COMMISSIONER HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO. LAUREN, CAN WE MOTION ON BOTH AT THE SAME TIME? OKAY. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? GOOD EVENING, MADAM CHAIRMAN. MY NAME IS DAVID KALLAUGHER WITH WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES.
11,000 SUITE, FRISCO STREET, SUITE 400, FRISCO, TEXAS, 75 033.
WE'RE, WE AGREE WITH STAFFS COMMENTS.
ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE'RE REQUESTING THE MULTIFAMILY IS BECAUSE ACROSS FROM THIS CROSSING WE UNDERSTAND THERE'S A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT IS GOING TO BE LESS THAN THE SINGLE FAMILY ESTATES TO OUR SOUTH.
SO THAT MOST LIKELY WOULD GO TO COMMERCIAL AS WELL.
SO WE FEEL IT'S A GOOD COMPLEMENTARY USE TO THE COMMERCIAL AND WE JUST REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL.
THANK YOU. DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? NO. ARE THERE ANY SPEAKER CARDS FOR THIS ITEM? AND AGAIN. NO.
OKAY. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:07 P.M.
AND CONFINE ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF REGARDING QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS ITEM.
ANY COMMENTS? NOW, I THINK THIS KIND OF FOR ME, IT SEEMS TO MAKE SENSE.
YOU KNOW, YOU'RE JAMMED IN BETWEEN PUBLIC WORKS, SELF STORAGE.
YOU GOT FRONTAGE ON HIGHWAY FIVE, WHICH MAKES SENSE FOR COMMERCIAL.
RIGHT. SO INSTEAD OF ABUTTING UP AGAINST AN ALREADY ESTABLISHED NEIGHBORHOOD, WE WON'T HAVE THAT ISSUE COMING FORTH, RIGHT? ANY OTHER COMMENTS? NO, MA'AM. OKAY.
IS THERE A MOTION ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 12? A MOTION TO PASS.
I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BLANSETT.
ALL IN FAVOR? WE HAVE A MOTION FOR BOTH TO APPROVE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE REZONING.
A MOTION TO APPROVE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REZONING.
ALL RIGHT, LET ME BACKTRACK THAT YOU NEED TO TAKE BACK YOUR MOTION.
TAKE IT BACK. WHAT DOES SHE HAVE TO SAY TO MAKE THAT? TO PUT THAT ON RECORD AS LEGAL? IT WOULD BE EASIER IF MISS MARTIN AMENDS HER ORIGINAL MOTION.
YES. DO YOU WANT ME TO STATE IT FOR YOU? YOU JUST HAVE TO SAY, I RECOMMEND TO APPROVE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE REZONING.
OKAY. I AMEND MY MOTION TO INCLUDE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE REZONING.
ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN FOR BOTH ITEMS. A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BLANSETT FOR BOTH ITEMS. ALL IN FAVOR,
[00:10:09]
MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.CONSIDER. DISCUSS ACTION REGARDING THE ANNA 23 CONCEPT PLAN.
APPLICANT IS ANNA PARKWAY DEVELOPMENT, LLC.
THIS ITEM IS CONTINGENT ON NUMBER 12.
I WILL MOTION FOR APPROVAL ON ITEM NUMBER 12.
MOTION FOR APPROVAL FOR ITEM NUMBER 13, I HAVE A.
I'LL SECOND A MOTION BY MYSELF AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ALL IN FAVOR,MOTION PASSES. UNANIMOUS.
CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACTION ON A REQUEST TO REZONE 28 PLUS ACRES FROM SFE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT TO REGIONAL COMMERCIAL C-2. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ROSAMOND PARKWAY AND US HIGHWAY 75.
APPLICANT MJLA ADAMS LTD AND ANNA 18 LLC.
I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:11 P.M..
A FUTURE DEVELOPER IS REQUESTING TO REZONE IT TO C-2 REGIONAL COMMERCIAL.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IDENTIFIES THIS AREA AS REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTER.
THE ZONING REQUEST IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SHALL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE, DENY OR APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS AND WE DID RECEIVE ONE LETTER FROM ONE OF THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNERS IN FAVOR.
DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? MY NAME IS ROBERT LEWIS, A CIVIL ENGINEER WITH KIMLEY-HORN, 2600 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, RICHARDSON, TEXAS.
WE'RE HERE THIS EVENING [INAUDIBLE].
DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? NO. ARE THERE ANY SPEAKER CARDS FOR THIS? NO. OKAY.
I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:13 P.M.
AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF.
ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS ITEM? OR COMMENTS.
YOU KNOW, THIS IS NOT A GOOD SPOT FOR SINGLE FAMILY.
YOU KNOW, MAJOR THOROUGHFARES THERE.
YEAH. YEP. IS THERE A MOTION ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 14? A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REZONING.
I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
ALL IN FAVOR, . MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
CONSIDER. DISCUSS ACTION ON A REQUEST TO AMEND AN EXISTING PLAN.
DEVELOPMENT FOR A SELF STORAGE MINI WAREHOUSE ON ONE LOT ON FIVE PLUS OR MINUS ACRES.
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ROSAMOND PARKWAY AND NORTH POWELL PARKWAY.
MISS MECKE. SO THIS REQUEST IS TO AMEND THE EXISTING PLAN DEVELOPMENT.
IT IS ONLY FOR A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, NOT THE ENTIRE TRACT.
IT ESSENTIALLY SAID THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL PRESERVED ON THIS CORNER.
IT'S A MAJOR CORNER IN ANNA YOU HAVE ROSAMOND HIGHWAY FIVE.
THEREFORE COMMERCIAL SHOULD BE HERE.
OVER THE YEARS IT HAS BEEN VERY DIFFICULT TO DEVELOP.
IN MY FOUR AND A HALF YEARS I'VE SEEN MULTIPLE PROPOSALS.
BUT THE THING IS THERE USED TO BE RESTRICTIONS ON ALCOHOL SALES.
[00:15:03]
AND SO WHAT THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING IS ON A PORTION OF THE TRACK THAT IS BEHIND OTHER COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES TO ALLOW SELF STORAGE, MINI WAREHOUSE AND A CHILD CARE CENTER, NURSERY SCHOOL, KINDERGARTEN.IT WAS VERY SPECIFIC THAT IT HAS TO USE THE USES FROM BACK IN 2018.
SO THAT HAS CAUSED A FEW CONFUSING THINGS WHEN TALKING TO POTENTIAL DEVELOPERS OF THE SITE.
SO I WANTED TO PUT IN FRONT OF YOU WHAT THE 2018 THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT LAND USES WERE.
NEXT TO THE CURRENT C-1 ZONING DISTRICT.
SO IT WAS PRETTY MUCH THE SAME FOR SELF STORAGE AND FOR A DAYCARE.
I DO THINK THAT YOU SHOULD ALSO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION POSSIBLY AMENDING FOR INDOOR COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT AND THE HOTEL USES BACK IN 2012 WE HAD A SIMILAR CASE WHERE A SELF STORAGE FACILITY WAS GOING IN NEXT TO A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND DUE TO THAT CASE, WE ENDED UP AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO CHANGE HOTEL MOTEL TO SPECIFIC USE PERMIT.
IT HAS A BUILDING SIZE RESTRICTION OF 15,000FT².
SO THE REQUEST IS TO AMEND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SPECIFICALLY FOR LAND USES.
SO FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, WHAT BUILDING IN COMPARISON WOULD BE A 15,000 SQUARE FOOT.
SO I DID PULL UP [INAUDIBLE] JUST FOR COMPARISON, THEY HAVE THREE BUILDINGS ON THEIR SITE.
ONE IS OVER 100,000FT², ONE IS 25,000FT², AND THE OTHER IS JUST UNDER 5000FT².
SO THE VICTORIA FALLS STRIP CENTER IS CLOSE.
IT MAY BE JUST SLIGHTLY LARGER THAN 15,000 SQUARE.
I WAS GOING TO SAY THOSE STRIP CENTERS THAT ARE AT THE CORNER OF FIVE A OR NOT FIVE 455 AND YOU KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT WILLOW CREEK OR WHATEVER IT IS WHERE LIKE THE NANDO'S IS THE TEX MEX, THOSE ARE ABOUT 15 ISH.
THEY'RE PROBABLY 10 TO 15,000FT.
SMART. YOU SAID ON HERE THAT PART OF THE PROPERTY THIS WOULD ONLY BE ON PART OF THE PROPERTY.
SO AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE LOCATOR MAP AS WELL AS ON THEIR CONCEPT PLAN, IT WOULD ONLY ALLOW THE USES FOR THE SELF STORAGE AND THE DAYCARE FACILITY ON THIS PART OF THE TRACT.
OKAY. WHAT? SORRY, I JUST WANT CLARIFICATION.
SO ON THE OUTSIDE IS GOING TO BE RETAIL STRIP CENTERS.
YES. SO WHAT THEY'RE SHOWING ON THE CONCEPT PLAN IS RETAIL ALONG ROSAMOND.
THERE'S A CAR WASH, A GAS STATION, SEVERAL RESTAURANTS AND MORE RETAIL.
I THOUGHT YOU SAID THAT WE COULDN'T.
THERE COULDN'T BE A CONVENIENCE STORE THERE BECAUSE THE ALCOHOL.
PREVIOUSLY, IN LAST AUGUST, THE ZONING ORDINANCE WAS REPEALED AND REPLACED AND ONE OF THE MAJOR SECTIONS THAT COUNCIL CHANGED HAD TO DO WITH ALCOHOL SALES. WE ESSENTIALLY REPEALED ALMOST ALL ALCOHOL SALE REGULATIONS, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF BARS PRIVATE CLUBS.
1 OR 2 OTHER USES. YEAH, I REMEMBER THAT.
HOW TALL IS WHAT? WHEN YOU SAY IN THE C-1 DISTRICT, THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 35FT.
THAT WAS IN THE PACKET, WASN'T IT? AND I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO POINT OUT RIGHT NOW, ALL WE'RE LOOKING AT IS JUST THE SELF STORAGE AND CHILD CARE THAT THE REST OF THAT SITE PLAN IS.
FOR PERSPECTIVE, HOW TALL IS THE SELF-STORAGE THAT JUST WENT IN OFF OF 455?
[00:20:06]
A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO AVERY POINT? YES. I COULDN'T TELL YOU THE EXACT HEIGHT.I THOUGHT WE APPROVED 35 FOR THAT ONE.
THE ONE WE APPROVED OVER 35 IS THE ONE GOING BEHIND LOWE'S.
OKAY. YES. SO WOULD THIS BE SIMILAR TO THAT IN TERMS OF LOOKS OR CAPABILITY AROUND HOUSES? I JUST REMEMBER THE OUTER OR THE CONVERSATIONS THAT WERE.
IT'S FURTHER BACK THAN THE AVERY POINT BUILDING.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? I HAVE A QUESTION. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE PAGE WHERE YOU HAD THE INDOOR COMMERCIAL AND AMUSEMENT LISTED? THANKS. SO THESE ARE USES THAT I AM SAYING THAT I THINK YOU SHOULD TAKE A LOOK AT.
I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH AN INDOOR COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT USE IN MCKINNEY, WHERE IT'S VERY SIMILAR.
IT HAS A BANK AND A GAS STATION ON IN FRONT OF IT AND THEN THE INDOOR COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT IS A, YOU KNOW, HIDDEN BEHIND THOSE BUSINESSES WHERE THIS IS KIND OF THE SAME.
SO IF A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY DOESN'T WORK OUT, IF A DAYCARE DOESN'T WORK OUT, DOES COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT MAKE SENSE HERE? SO IF WE APPROVE THE DAYCARE AND THE STORAGE, WE COULD ALSO APPROVE IT.
NOW TO GO AHEAD AND APPROVE AN INDOOR COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT AND THEN ANOTHER ITEM YOU MENTIONED WAS THAT WE NEED TO CONSIDER CHANGING THE HEIGHT OR THE SQUARE FOOTAGE, THE 15, THE BUILDING SIZE.
OKAY. WAS THERE A RECOMMENDATION ON WHAT TO CHANGE TO FOR 15,000 TO 25,000FT²? SO BASED OFF OF THE ONE THAT WAS BUILT IN AVERY POINT.
SO THEY'RE 25,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WAS A ONE STORY.
THAT'S THE ONE THAT'S IN THE REAR, NOT THE ONE THAT'S ON.
SO THE APPLICANT DID NOT SPECIFY BECAUSE I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT.
WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE, HOWEVER LARGE OF A FOOTPRINT WE ALLOW, WE CAN STILL PARK IT.
SO IT WOULD NEED TO FIT WITHIN OUR PARKING CODE.
RIGHT AND ON THE CONCEPT PLAN I WOULD HAVE TO GO BACK AND LOOK.
BUT THEY DID PROVIDE WHAT THE CURRENT PARKING RATIO IS.
SO THEY DEFINITELY HAVE ROOM TO EXPAND ON PARKING IF NEEDED.
SO IF THEY WERE TO DO A INDOOR ENTERTAINMENT FACILITY, WOULD THEY NEED A SUP FOR THAT? SO THAT'S WHY I'M RECOMMENDING THAT YOU TAKE A LOOK AT IT IF YOU WANT.
CURRENTLY, THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT.
OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NOT FOR CITY STAFF, BUT FOR THE DEVELOPER.
DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? THAT WOULD BE NO.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? GUESS NOT. QUESTIONS REMAIN.
YOU WANT TO TABLE IT UNTIL THEY CAN COME AND PRESENT AND TALK TO US.
OR DO YOU WANNA DO PART OF IT? JUST CURIOUS. WHAT? YOUR QUESTION.
I JUST HAD A QUESTION ON THE SELF STORAGE UNIT.
LIKE IF THEY HAD. I KNOW IT'S JUST A CONCEPT, SO IT'S OBVIOUSLY GOING TO CHANGE.
BUT YOU KNOW, IF THEY WERE GOING TOWARDS A ONE STORY OR TWO STORY, MAYBE THAT WOULD HELP US COME UP WITH A SQUARE FOOT TO THROW OUT THERE, BECAUSE I'D LIKE TO INCORPORATE THAT IN WITH AN APPROVAL OR DENIAL.
BUT IF THEY DON'T WANT TO SPEAK TO IT, THEN.
IT'S KIND OF HARD TO GET A LOT OF SQUARE FOOT.
TRUE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ARE THERE ANY SPEAKER CARDS FOR THIS ITEM? NO. OKAY, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:24 P.M.
AND CONFINE ALL COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF.
SO COMMISSIONER VOLLMER BROUGHT UP A VERY GOOD QUESTION.
SHALL WE TABLE THIS AND LET THE APPLICANT COME AND SPEAK? I MEAN, I'M OKAY WITH PASSING IT AND IT JUST RESTRICTS THEM TO 15,000FT, WHICH MEANS IF THAT'S NOT GOOD ENOUGH OR LARGE ENOUGH FOR THEM, THEN THEY HAVE TO BRING IT BACK.
THAT'S MORE OF AN INCONVENIENCE FOR THEM.
BUT I MEAN, ALSO US, BUT, WELL, THEY'LL HAVE TO COME BACK WITH AN SUP ON THAT.
[00:25:03]
THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY.RATHER THAN GOING THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS AND DELAYING, IS IT WORTH JUST TABLING THOUGH GETTING THE QUESTIONS ANSWERED, DOING IT ONE TIME WE ALREADY HAVE THIS INFORMATION, NOT STALLING IT. I'LL JUST TELL YOU NOW I DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE VOTING ON IT IN A POSITIVE MANNER, NOT KNOWING THAT GOING THROUGH THE ONE AT THE AVERY POINT, HAVING SOME OF THOSE QUESTIONS, NOT UNDERSTANDING SIGNIFICANTLY, LIKE THE DISTANCE THE HOUSES ARE ALONGSIDE IT, HOW TALL THEY'RE TRYING TO GO, HOW CLOSE.
I JUST HAVE QUESTIONS THAT REMAIN AND I'D LIKE TO HEAR THEIR PLANS.
YEAH. I MEAN, YOU HAVE THE SAME CONCERNS I DO.
THAT'S EXACTLY WHY I'M ASKING.
I WAS LIKE, I WANT TO KNOW IF THEY WANT TO GO TWO STORY WITH IT.
AND THEY SAY IT'S DUE TO THE PARAPET WALL.
YOU KNOW, THERE'S A LOT OF QUESTIONS THAT ARE OUTSTANDING FOR ME AS FAR AS THE CONCEPT.
I LOVE THE DAYCARE GOING THERE AROUND ALL THE RESIDENTIAL HOMES.
I LIKE THE RETAIL. THEY DID COME BACK WITH SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.
BUT I DO HAVE QUESTIONS ON THE SELF STORAGE, SO I'M ALL SECOND IF YOU WANT A MOTION.
THAT MAY CAUSE A PROBLEM FOR SOMEBODY.
ON A POSITIVE NOTE, THOUGH, IT DOES GIVE THEM THAT BUFFER BETWEEN THAT AND THAT COMMERCIAL PROPERTY.
SO THAT WAS ONE OF THE MAIN CONCERNS THE LAST TIME IT WAS PRESENTED TO P AND Z.
SO ONCE AGAIN, PRO TEAM TABLE ALL MOTION TO TABLE TO BRING BACK IN JULY.
ALL IN FAVOR, MOTION PASSES. UNANIMOUS.
THIS IS CONTINGENT ON THAT ONE.
WE WILL TABLE THAT I MOTION TO TABLE THAT ONE UNTIL THE JULY 1ST MEETING AS WELL.
A SECOND WHO WANTS TO CLAIM THAT SECOND, COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
ALL IN FAVOR MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
FROM LOCAL COMMERCIAL C1 DISTRICT WITHIN THE THOROUGHFARE OVERLAY DISTRICT TO DOWNTOWN CORE.
APPLICANT IS MEL TEX, INCORPORATED.
I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:28 P.M..
MISS MECKE THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NEXT CORNER OVER HERE.
PART OF THE REASON WHY I WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT THE THOR OVERLAY DISTRICT IS BECAUSE IF YOU READ THE THOR OVERLAY DISTRICT, IT REQUIRES A 50 FOOT BUILDING SETBACK AND ONLY EXCLUDES THE DOWNTOWN ZONING.
NOT THE DOWNTOWN AREA, BUT THE DOWNTOWN ZONING.
SO RIGHT NOW, IF SOMEONE WERE TO COME IN AND DEMOLISH THE EXISTING BUILDING THAT'S ON THE PROPERTY, THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING, BECAUSE THERE'S ALSO A 15 FOOT EASEMENT ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
THE C-1 DISTRICT, ALTHOUGH TECHNICALLY IS IN CONFORMANCE.
CURRENTLY IT MAKES MORE SENSE TO REZONE IT TO THE DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICT.
DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO. DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? REPRESENTING. [INAUDIBLE] SO CAN YOU PLEASE SPEAK UP INTO THE MICROPHONE OR BEND IT DOWN? THERE YOU GO. MAYBE THAT'LL HELP.
[00:30:01]
[INAUDIBLE] I'M JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.DO COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR THIS APPLICANT? NO, NO.
ARE THERE ANY SPEAKER CARDS FOR THIS ITEM? NO. OKAY.
I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:30.
THANK YOU MA'AM AND CONFINE ALL COMMENTS TO COMMISSION AND STAFF.
ARE THERE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS ON THIS ITEM? NO. IS THERE A MOTION ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 17? ALL MOTION TO APPROVE.
I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HERMANN TO APPROVE AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER VOLLMER.
ALL IN FAVOR, MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
CONSIDER. DISCUSS ACTION REGARDING THE A.L.
GEER ADDITION BLOCK A LOT 1R REPLAT APPLICANT, MEL TEX INCORPORATED.
THIS IS CONTINGENT ON ITEM NUMBER 17.
YES. OKAY, I WILL MOTION TO APPROVE.
IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WALDEN.
ALL IN FAVOR, MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 19 IS WORK PROGRAM, MISS MECKE.
[Future Agenda Items]
SO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 19 IS FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND THE COUNCIL LIAISON TO GIVE STAFF SOME FEEDBACK ESSENTIALLY AND AS WELL AS FOR STAFF TO COMMUNICATE WHAT'S GOING ON WITH OUR WORKLOAD.OBVIOUSLY OVER THE LAST FIVE MONTHS, IT HAS BEEN CHALLENGING LOSING BOTH A DIRECTOR AND PLANNER TOO AND LEAVING IT ON ME AND BECKY AND THEN NOW WE HAVE EVERETT AND STARTING NEXT MONDAY, WE HAVE A NEW DIRECTOR COMING IN.
SO NOW IS THE TIME FOR YOU TO, YOU KNOW, IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT YOU WANT TO ME TO GIVE A PRESENTATION ABOUT, IF THERE'S SOMETHING IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS THAT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND.
WHY IS COMMERCIAL AMUSEMENT INDOOR CONSIDERED SUP FOR EVERYTHING? YOU KNOW, I CAN GIVE YOU A PRESENTATION ON WHAT OTHER CITIES DO AND THOSE KIND OF RESEARCH ACTIVITIES.
DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY SUGGESTIONS AT THIS TIME? I'M GOING TO PLAY THE NEW CARD HERE.
IT WOULD BE NICE IF WE COULD SEE OR AT LEAST HAVE A PRESENTATION ON THE SLIDE.
JUST SOMETHING QUICK TO GIVE AN IDEA OF HOW MANY AREAS AND WHERE THEY'RE AT.
THE ZONE MULTIFAMILY AND JUST KIND OF PUT THAT ON A MAP TO PUT OUT HERE, ESPECIALLY WHENEVER SOMEONE'S TRYING TO PRESENT SO WE CAN LOOK AT WHERE IT'S IN PLAY WITH EVERYTHING ELSE. CERTAINLY THAT IS A MAP THAT I DO KEEP ACTIVE.
THE GIS MANAGER AND I WORK TOGETHER ON THAT, BUT I CERTAINLY WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO DO THAT AND THAT'S SOMETHING SIMPLE I CAN DO FOR THE NEXT MEETING AND IS THAT JUST FOR THE MULTIFAMILY? THAT WAS MY REQUEST.
JUST TO GET AN IDEA WHENEVER IT'S GOING TO COME UP.
YEP. CAN YOU INCLUDE THAT EVERY TIME THAT MULTIFAMILY COMES ACROSS? THAT'S A GREAT SUGGESTION, COMMISSIONER.
THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF P&Z.
SO THAT'S THAT'S SOMETHING YOU WANT TO ADD TO IT.
ANY OTHER SUGGESTIONS? NO. KEEP IN MIND, IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER SUGGESTIONS, JUST DROP AN EMAIL TO MISS MECKE AND SHE CAN TAKE CARE OF THAT.
SO I DID WANT TO HIGHLIGHT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT I'VE PUT ON THERE CURRENTLY.
SO THAT'S SOMETHING I WOULD LIKE TO BRING FORWARD.
REZONING DOWNTOWN IS A BIG PROJECT THAT I WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE BEEN WORKING ON.
SO THAT'S ONE THAT I REALLY WANT TO WORK WITH Y'ALL ON REVIEWING THAT DISTRICT SPECIFICALLY.
THE STATE LAW CHANGED LAST YEAR IN SEPTEMBER FOR ZONING.
IF A EXISTING LAND USE IS ON A PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY IS REZONED TO A DISTRICT, THAT LAND USE IS NO LONGER ALLOWED, WE ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A SPECIAL LETTER TO THEM.
[00:35:07]
I THINK YOUR WORKLOAD HAS BEEN ENOUGH FOR THE LAST FEW MONTHS.ANY OTHER COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS? I HAVE ONE, AND I'M NOT PICKING ON YOU BECAUSE I KNOW YOUR WORKLOAD HAS BEEN REALLY BUSY.
IF WE CAN GET THE PACKETS BEFORE FRIDAY AFTER FIVE TO REVIEW, I GET THEM OUT BEFORE FIVE.
GENERALLY. WELL, BEFORE WE LOST THE DIRECTOR AND PLANNER TOO.
WE WERE GETTING THEM ON WEDNESDAY, SO HOPEFULLY WE'LL GET BACK TO THAT.
YEAH. IF WEDNESDAYS WOULD BE VERY BENEFICIAL YEAH, FOR US.
YEAH. ANYTHING ELSE? JUST A CURIOSITY.
YOU SAID WORKLOADS HIGH A LOT OF ZONING ISSUES, A LOT OF ZONING CASES.
WHAT'S THE TYPICAL QUESTION OR THE TOP 2 OR 3 QUESTIONS YOU'RE GETTING ABOUT ZONING CHANGES OR LOCATIONS? IT'S IT'S EVERYWHERE.
SO IT'S JUST THERE'S A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY GOING ON.
NOT TO PUT YOU ON THE SPOT, MAYOR, BUT MAYBE IN THE NEAR FUTURE, AS YOU GET SETTLED IN AND A NEW COUNCIL GETS SETTLED IN, WE CAN MEET AS A GROUP TO GO OVER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, SOME OF THE CRESTS COMING IN, LOOK AT IT AND SEE IF EVERYBODY'S IN ALIGNMENT OR CONFORMING AT ALL AND WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE, IF IT NEEDS TO BE REVIEWED OR IF THERE'S SPECIFIC ANSWERS WE CAN GIVE YOU AHEAD OF TIME OR PUT OUT TO LIKE LEVEL THAT ON THE WORK PROGRAM.
YEAH. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DEFINITELY NEEDS TO BE RELOOKED AT.
NOW, I AGREE THAT WAS ONE OF THE THINGS I MENTIONED TO YOU IN THE LAST ONE.
SO DO WE HAVE A PLAN THAT SHOWS ALL THE CURRENT CONSTRUCTION GOING ON? SINGLE FAMILY, NOT JUST MULTIFAMILY, SINGLE FAMILY COMMERCIAL AND HOW IT'S LABELED THAT WE COULD SEE AS WELL.
THERE MAYBE I'LL HAVE TO GET WITH OUR GIS MANAGER TO SEE WHAT HE'S PUTTING TOGETHER THESE DAYS.
I KNOW FOR CIP THEY HAVE A MONTHLY MAP, BUT AS FAR AS ACTIVE, LIKE BUILDING SITES LIKE SUBDIVISIONS, I DON'T KNOW THAT WE'RE STILL DOING THAT. YEAH, IF THERE IS ONE, I WOULD PERSONALLY THINK IT WOULD BE BENEFICIAL FOR US.
SOME OF US HAVE BEEN HERE TO SEE SOME OF THEM.
SO IT'D BE GOOD TO BE ABLE TO KNOW WHICH ONES HAVE BEEN UP HERE BEFORE.
I HELP THEM UPDATE THAT EVERY YEAR.
UNFORTUNATELY, THERE'S JUST SO MUCH DEVELOPMENT THAT UPDATING IT ONCE A YEAR ISN'T ENOUGH.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? NO. ALL RIGHT.
SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BLANSETT.
ALL IN FAVOR, MOTION PASSES. UNANIMOUS MEETING IS ADJOURNED AT 6:38P.M.
THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.