Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

OK WELCOME EVERYBODY TO THE CITY OF ANNA PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING FOR DECEMBER 5TH, 2022.

[1. Call to Order and Establishment of Quorum]

[00:00:08]

THE TIME IS 7 P.M.

AND WE ARE NOW IN SESSION.

WE HAVE TWO COMMISSIONERS THAT ARE OUT.

COMMISSIONER CLEMENS AND COMMISSIONER OGAN.

PLEASE RISE FOR THE INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

MR. HERMAN.

YES, WE'LL PRAY FOR.

OUR FATHER IN HEAVEN. WE'RE GRATEFUL FOR THIS DAY FOR THE OPPORTUNITY THAT WE HAVE TO MEET TOGETHER AS A PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO DISCUSS THE FUTURE OF THE CITY.

WE ASKED THE FATHER TO PLEASE BE WITH US TO.

HELP US AS WE DELIBERATE TO HELP US THINK CLEARLY AND BE ABLE TO DISCUSS [INAUDIBLE] AMEN.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER HERMAN.

AT THIS TIME, ANY PERSON MAY ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING AN ITEM ON THIS MEETING AGENDA THAT IS NOT SCHEDULED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING.

ALSO, AT THIS TIME, ANY PERSON MAY ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING AN ITEM THAT IS NOT ON THIS MEETING AGENDA.

EACH PERSON WILL BE ALLOWED UP TO 3 MINUTES TO SPEAK.

NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION MAY BE TAKEN AT THIS TIME AT THIS MEETING ON ITEMS NOT LISTED ON THIS AGENDA, OTHER THAN TO MAKE STATEMENTS OF SPECIFIC FACTUAL INFORMATION IN RESPONSE TO A CITIZEN'S INQUIRY OR TO RECITE EXISTING POLICY IN RESPONSE TO THE INQUIRY.

THE STAFF HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS TO BE READ AT THIS TIME? I WILL NOW CLOSE ITEM THREE AND MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT ITEMS ON THE AGENDA.

DOES ANY COMMISSIONER WISH TO PULL THE ITEMS FROM CONSENT AGENDA?

[Consent Items]

NO. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT ITEMS 5 THROUGH 14? MOTION TO APPROVE. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WENZEL.

ALL IN FAVOR.

UNANIMOUS. MOVING ON TO ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION CONSIDERED DISCUSS ACTION ON APPOINTING A COMMISSION MEMBER TO THE

[Items for Individual Consideration]

WAYFINDER TASK FORCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JOEY GRISSOM.

IS A MOUTHFUL, ISN'T IT? THANK YOU. PRESIDENT PATTERSON HERNDON.

THANK YOU P&Z BOARD.

IT'S A PRIVILEGE TO BE WITH YOU, AND I'LL GET TO SEE YOU A WHOLE LOT.

SO IT'S ALWAYS A PRIVILEGE TO BE BEFORE YOU.

SO TONIGHT, I'VE GOT JUST A VERY SHORT PRESENTATION TO TALK WITH YOU ABOUT.

WAYFINDING SIGNAGE.

SO JUST REALLY BRIEFLY, A LITTLE BACKGROUND.

SO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PARTNERSHIP WITH THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OWNED A PIECE OF PROPERTY, AS YOU KNOW, THE ANNA BUSINESS PARK, WHICH WE SOLD EARLIER THIS YEAR AND TO UTILIZE SOME OF THE FUNDING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, MET WITH ADC BOARD IN A JOINT MEETING BACK IN JUNE, AND THEY IDENTIFIED SEVERAL ITEMS OF INTEREST PRIORITIES THAT THEY WANTED TO PURSUE.

AND ONE OF THOSE IS, I THINK YOU WOULD AGREE IS IS IMPORTANT TO COMMUNITY IS SIGNAGE, WAYFINDING SIGNAGE AND GATEWAY ENTRY SIGNAGE.

YOU SEE THESE IN A LOT OF COMMUNITIES THAT YOU GO IN.

IT BECOMES KIND OF A PART OF OUR KIND OF OUR MARKETING INITIATIVES AND AND JUST, YOU KNOW, KIND OF AN INTRO AND WELCOME TO A CITY, RIGHT? YOU KNOW, YOU WANT TO WELCOME PEOPLE AS THEY DRIVE BY, WHETHER THAT'S 75 HIGHWAY FIVE, ROSEMAN YOU KNOW, FERGUSON PARKWAY.

SO AS A PART OF THAT, THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STAFF BEGAN WORKING WITH OUR PUBLIC WORKS GROUP WHO HAD APPROVED LIST OF VENDORS.

AND SO WE ARE GOING TO KIND OF WALK YOU THROUGH JUST A COUPLE OF THINGS HERE BEFORE I GET INTO THAT.

I THINK YOU KIND OF KNOW WHAT WAYFINDING SIGNAGE IS.

YOU'VE SEEN IT IN DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES.

WAYFINDING ALSO KIND OF INCORPORATES GATEWAY ENTRANCE SIGNS.

AND, YOU KNOW, SOME CITIES YOU GO IN WHERE THEY JUST HAD THE LETTERING WITH THE COMMUNITY NAME.

OTHER CITIES, YOU KNOW, HAVE A BIG LANDSCAPED.

YOU KNOW, IF YOU GO THROUGH MELISSA, YOU SAY THEY'VE DONE SOME LANDSCAPING.

I THINK THEY DID THAT THROUGH A PROBABLY A GREEN RIBBON PROJECT, WHICH WE HAVE A SIMILAR PROJECT HERE IN ANNA.

BUT IT'S A SENSE OF PLACE.

YOU WANT TO CREATE A WELCOME AGAIN.

AND AS WE ADD MORE VENUES TO THE COMMUNITY, IT'S ALWAYS A PRIVILEGE THERE.

YOU CAN SAY IT LOOKS LIKE ANNA WITH THAT TOWER THERE.

BUT SIGNAGE IS VERY IMPORTANT.

IT CONNECTS PEOPLE TO LOCATIONS, LIBRARY TO OUR FUTURE, LIKE I SAID, VENUES OF INTEREST.

AND SO SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT THAT THE COUNCIL KIND OF IDENTIFIED AS WELL AS OUR BOARD.

[00:05:04]

SO AS I MENTIONED, WE STARTED A PROCESS WITH LEE ENGINEERING.

SO THE FUNDING WILL COME FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, WHICH IS OUR TYPE B CORPORATION.

LEE ENGINEERING WAS AN EASY SELECTION BECAUSE THEY'VE DONE A LOT OF WORK, MAINLY WITH TXDOT.

AND AS YOU KNOW, MOST WAYFINDING SIGNAGE IS TYPICALLY GOING TO BE EITHER IN A TXDOT RIGHT OF WAY OR THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.

SO IT'S ALWAYS CRITICAL TO HAVE ENGINEERS THAT HAVE HAD EXPERIENCE WITH THAT.

ANOTHER PART OF THIS WILL BE A SEPARATE DESIGN TEAM, WHICH THEY WILL KIND OF WILL BE A SUB UNDER THEM AS MERGE DESIGN.

AND IF YOU GO TO THEIR WEBSITE, YOU'LL SEE THEY'VE DONE SIGNAGE, DESIGNS AND CITIES ALL AROUND THE COUNTRY IN THE METROPLEX, CITIES LIKE GARLAND, MANSFIELD, DALLAS. SO THEY'VE DONE QUITE A BIT OF WORK IN THE REGION.

THE FUNDING, AS I SAID, THE CDC, THE FIRST PHASE IS JUST RIGHT UNDER $36,000.

THAT REALLY KIND OF STARTS US OUT, ONE WITH KIND OF ASSESSMENT FROM THE ENGINEERING GROUP AND THEN A PART B OF THAT WOULD BE MORE DESIGN AS A PART OF THAT WOULD BE A STEERING COMMITTEE, WHICH WILL BE MAINLY STAFF, BUT ALSO A TASK FORCE THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO MODEL SIMILAR TO WHAT WAS DONE WITH THE LIBRARY PROJECT.

WE THINK IT'S CRITICAL TO HAVE COMMUNITY INPUT INTO THESE TYPE PROJECTS.

SO AS A PART OF THIS, WE'RE LOOKING AT A NINE MEMBER BOARD, AS YOU CAN SEE THERE, TWO MEMBERS FROM COUNCIL, TWO FROM THE CDC, EDC BOARD, AND THEN ONE MEMBER FROM OTHER BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, WHICH IS WHAT BRINGS ME HERE TONIGHT, IS TO ASK THE BOARD WHO YOU WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE WITH THIS.

I WOULD ANTICIPATE AT LEAST PROBABLY AROUND THREE MEETINGS OVER THE COMING NEXT FOUR MONTHS, AND WE STILL DON'T KNOW DATES AND TIMES, BUT THAT'S STILL TO BE DETERMINED.

BUT I WOULD ANTICIPATE THREE MEETINGS AND I THINK IT WILL BE A FUN EXERCISE FOR SOMEONE TO GET INVOLVED AND PROVIDE FEEDBACK AND DESIGN, WHICH IS REALLY WHAT THIS GROUP WILL BE HEAVILY INVOLVED WITH IN THE PROCESS.

AND THAT'S KIND OF A TENTATIVE SCHEDULE, KIND OF KICKING OFF REALLY IN JANUARY, GOING THROUGH PROBABLY LATE APRIL, EARLY MAY.

THE NEXT STEP AFTER THAT WAS ONCE WE HAVE DESIGNED THE SCHEMATICS, THEN YOU GO TO ACTUALLY PAYING FOR SIGNAGE AND THEN THAT'D BE IDENTIFYING PROBABLY DOING THAT IN A PHASING APPROACH OF WHERE WE'RE GOING TO PUT SIGNS.

WE'RE NOT GOING TO PUT BE ABLE TO PUT UP 20 SIGNS IMMEDIATELY, BUT KIND OF A PHASED PROCESS.

SO REALLY KIND OF KICKS IT OFF HERE PRETTY SHORTLY.

SO THE NEXT STEP AS THIS GOES TO COUNCIL, ACTUALLY NEXT TUESDAY NIGHT, WE'VE MET WITH THEM IN A WORK SESSION.

SO THEY'VE BEEN VERY FAVORABLE.

SO IF IT PASSES NEXT WEEK, THEN LIKE I SAY, WE'LL MOVE INTO JANUARY AND KICK THIS OFF.

AND WE'RE REALLY EXCITED ABOUT IT TO REALLY GET THIS OUT THERE.

AND WITH THAT, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.

COMMISSIONER, I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY VOLUNTEERS INTERESTED? I DO IT. MINE.

YEAH. BOTH OF YOU GUYS TRAVEL.

I'LL DO IT. ALL RIGHT.

DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR.

MAKE A MOTION THAT KELLY PATTERSON HERNDON BE THE P AND Z REP ON THE TASK FORCE.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? I SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WENZEL AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUS ON TO NUMBER ITEM NUMBER 16, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING.

DISCUSS, CONSIDER ACTION ON AVERY POINT, PHASE ONE, BLOCK U, LOTS CA-67R AND 68 REPLAT APPLICANT AVERY POINT RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY INCORPORATED CARE OF DANIELLE LA SCHOLAR, MANAGING AGENT AND NOVUS NTD REALTY LLC.

GOOD EVENING, THE REPLY BEFORE YOU IS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE LOT 67R WAS ONE LOT.

BACK IN 2016 LENNAR HOMES SOLD A SECTION OF THIS.

THE NEW OWNER CAME IN AND WANTED TO DEVELOP THIS TRACT OF LAND, BUT UNFORTUNATELY WHEN IT WAS SOLD IT WAS SOLD BY METES AND BOUNDS.

THERE WAS NO REPLAT THAT WAS DONE AT THAT TIME TO RECOGNIZE THIS LOT, WHICH IS THE REASON WHY THE REPLAT IS BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING.

DO COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:10 P.M..

IS THE APPLICANT HERE WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? NO, AND NO SPEAKER CARDS.

[00:10:03]

OKAY. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:10.

WHOLE 30 SECONDS.

DO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS? NO. OKAY.

DO I HAVE A MOTION ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 16.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AS WRITTEN.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.

I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HERMAN AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NYLEC.

ALL IN FAVOR.

ITEM NUMBER 17, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING.

CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACTION ON A REQUEST TO REZONE 1.2 PLUS ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST FOURTH STREET AND SOUTH SHIRLEY AVENUE. APPLICANT IS THE CITY OF ANNA.

MR. ALTOBELLI. YES, GOOD EVENING COMMISSION, ROSS ALTOBELLI, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

SO THE ZONING REQUEST IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SHIRLEY HERITAGE PARK.

CURRENTLY, RIGHT NOW THE PROPERTY ZONED S.F.

1, WHICH IS SINGLE FAMILY OR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.

THE REQUEST BEFORE YOU IS TO REZONE IT PLAN DEVELOPMENT WITH THE BASE ZONING OF CBRD CENTRAL BUSINESS REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.

THE CITY STAFF FELT AS IF THIS WOULD BE THE BEST BASE ZONING BECAUSE OF THE ALLOWABLE SETBACKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT THOUGH THE CITY IS REQUESTING THAT WE MODIFY SOME DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND THAT WOULD TO HELP FACILITATE THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS THAT ARE OUT THERE RIGHT NOW.

ONE BEING MAXIMUM HEIGHT.

YOU HAVE THE SERVICE YARD THAT'S OUT THERE WHERE EXCEEDS 35 FEET, SOME OF THE STRUCTURES THAT ARE OUT THERE.

ADDITIONALLY, THE SETBACKS CITY STAFF IS REQUESTING THAT THE SETBACKS ALONG ALL RIGHTS OF WAY BE ZERO.

THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR THE PROPOSED TRAIN THAT WILL BE COMING IN BECAUSE THAT IS AN EXISTING STRUCTURE.

THERE'S ALSO AN EXISTING RESTROOM FACILITY THAT IS OUT THERE THAT'S INSIDE THE EXISTING SETBACK.

ALSO, WE'RE REQUESTING A FIVE FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY THAT IS SHARED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

ADDITIONALLY, THE CITY DOES HAVE SCREENING REQUIREMENTS THAT WILL NEED TO MODIFY THAT AS IT RELATES TO THE SCREENING ALONG THE EASTERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY.

AGAIN, THIS IS A CITY PARK.

IT'S NOT A NUISANCE RIGHT NOW, SO WE DON'T SEE A CONCERN WITH THAT AS WELL AS THERE'S BARBED WIRE FENCING THAT'S AROUND LOT TWO, WHICH IS THE SERVICE YARD.

BARBED WIRE FENCING IS NOT ALLOWED IN THE MAJORITY OF OUR ZONING DISTRICTS.

SO THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD ALSO BE ALLOWED.

BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.

BUT AGAIN, THIS IS JUST A CLEAN UP THE EXISTING ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY AND ALLOW FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE PROPOSED IN THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE.

HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.

I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:13.

JUST ADDRESSED IT. NO SPEAKER CARDS FOR THIS ITEM.

OKAY. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ITEM? ANYONE? OKAY.

CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:13.

IS THERE A MOTION ON AGENDA ITEM 17? MY MOTION FOR APPROVAL.

I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY PATTERSON HERNDON FOR APPROVAL, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

ALL IN FAVOR? PASSES UNANIMOUS.

ON TOO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 18.

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING.

CONSIDER DISCUSS ACTION ON THE SHIRLEY PARK ADDITION BLOCK A, LOTS ONE AND TWO REPLAT.

MR. ALTOBELLI.

YES, THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL REPLAT WHICH REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING.

AGAIN, THIS IS TO REPLAT THE PROPERTY INTO TWO LOTS.

YOU'D HAVE LOT ONE WHICH WOULD BE THE EXISTING PARK ITSELF, AND LOT TWO WOULD BE THE GOVERNMENT SERVICE YARD, WHICH INCLUDES THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR EXCUSE ME, NOT WASTEWATER, BUT THE WATER STORAGE TANKS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? OKAY. I WILL OPEN THAT PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:14.

ARE THERE ANY SPEAKER CARDS FOR THIS ITEM? NO. OKAY.

I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:14.

IS THERE A MOTION ON AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 18? MOTION TO APPROVE. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN TO APPROVE.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND IT.

SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WENZEL.

ALL IN FAVOR.

[00:15:10]

PASSES UNANIMOUS.

ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 19.

CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACTION ON THE SHIRLEY PARK CONDITION BLOCK A, LOTS ONE AND TWO SITE PLAN.

MR. ALTOBELLI.

YES THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE EXISTING AS WELL AS THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE SHIRLEY HERITAGE PARK.

THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THAT OF THE THE RAIL LINE THAT'S GOING TO BE GOING IN FOR THE TRAIN THAT SHOULD BE COMING IN THE IMMEDIATE FUTURE.

BUT IT ALSO DOES SHOW THE EXISTING PLAYGROUND FACILITIES AS WELL AS THE THE WATER FEATURES AND WATER STRUCTURES.

WAS THIS CONTINGENT ON ITEM NUMBER 18? IT IS. YES, MA'AM.

OKAY. WELL, I WILL MOTION FOR APPROVAL ON THAT ONE.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.

THE SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NYLEC.

ALL IN FAVOR.

UNANIMOUS. ITEM NUMBER 20, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING.

CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACTION ON A REQUEST TO REZONE 98 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST WHITE STREET, 500 PLUS OR MINUS FEET EAST OF SOUTH, INTERURBAN STREET FROM AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT SFE SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL, LARGE LOT AND PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT APPLICANT IS RISING WAKULLA INVESTMENTS LP, MR. ALTOBELLI. YES, IF YOU ALL RECALL, THIS ZONING REQUEST CAME BEFORE YOU LAST SUMMER IN WHICH THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.

THE ITEM THEN EVENTUALLY WENT TO CITY COUNCIL AND AT THAT TIME THE APPLICANT REQUESTED TO WITHDRAW THE ZONING REQUEST.

I PROVIDED INSIDE YOUR PACKET A LETTER EXPLAINING FROM THE APPLICANT THEIR RATIONALE ASSOCIATED WITH IT.

SO THE PROPOSED ZONING BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING WILL ALLOW FOR BOTH A RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

THE APPLICANT, SIMILAR TO THE PREVIOUS REQUEST, IS RESTRICTING LESS DESIRABLE COMMERCIAL USES THAT THEY'VE WORKED WITH STAFF ON THERE, ENHANCING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG FUTURE LEONARD AVENUE, AS WELL AS AN ENTIRE CENTRALIZED ROADWAY.

THEIR PRESERVING THE EXISTING TREE LINE ALONG THE DART RIGHT OF WAY AS LONG ALONG ALSO THEIR SOUTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY THAT IS SHARED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANNA TOWN SQUARE. AND THEY'RE PROPOSING TO MODIFY SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACKS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS.

THE ANNA 2050 DOWNTOWN MASTERPLAN IDENTIFIES THIS AREA AS A CATALYST AREA.

THERE ARE FOUR CATALYST AREAS IN WHICH HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN TO HELP SPUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY AND ARE LOOKED AT IS UNIQUE WHERE THERE THE FOLLOWING PRIMARY BUILDING TYPES ARE APPROPRIATE, WHERE WE LOOK FOR MIXED USE OFFICE STOREFRONT RETAIL, URBAN ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL.

IT'S MORE OF A TYPE OF FORM OF DEVELOPMENT THAT ALLOWS FOR A MIXED USE ENVIRONMENT.

SO THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE PREVIOUS REQUEST AND THIS NEW REQUEST, I FELT THAT IT BE IMPORTANT FOR YOU ALL THAT WAY.

YOU HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION.

YOU KNOW, THERE WERE FOUR ITEMS. ONE, THEY REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL THAT WAS BEING PRESERVED BY ROUGHLY 35%.

THERE WAS A CIVIC EVENT SPACE THAT WAS LOCATED BETWEEN THE TWO PROPOSED COMMERCIAL AREAS THAT IS ALSO BEEN REMOVED.

THE TOWNHOME PRODUCT THAT THE APPLICANT WAS INITIALLY PROPOSING THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED.

HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT IS INTRODUCING A NEW SF 72 PRODUCT, WHICH IS ONE OF OUR LARGER RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INCORPORATE THAT INTO THE DESIGN.

SO THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE BEING PROPOSED, THERE IS AN SFZ PRODUCT WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED.

AND AGAIN, THE APPLICANT CAN GO INTO THE DIFFERENT TYPE OF PRODUCT HE HAS FOR THE SFZ.

THERE'S ALSO THE SF 60 AS WELL AS THE SF 72.

THERE ARE SOME MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM REQUIREMENTS OR ALLOWANCES THAT WE PUT INSIDE THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ENSURE THAT IF THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDS FOR APPROVAL AND COUNCIL ULTIMATELY APPROVES, THAT IT MEETS THAT OF THE CONCEPT PLAN THAT IS BEING SHOWN.

IT'S ONE OF THOSE THINGS WHERE STAFF FEELS IS IMPORTANT TO ENSURE THAT WE'RE WE'RE NOT APPROVING ONE ZONING DISTRICT AND THEN YOU ALL GET ONE PRODUCT.

WE'RE JUST ONE ENSURE THAT WE'RE GETTING WHAT IS ACTUALLY BEING SHOWN ON THE CONCEPT PLAN.

SO A QUICK OVERVIEW IS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PATTERN IS THAT OF A TYPICAL SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL DESIGN.

[00:20:06]

IT BASICALLY MATCHES THAT OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT YOU SEE BETWEEN US 75 AS WELL AS STATE HIGHWAY FIVE, WHERE YOU HAVE THE COMMERCIAL FRONTAGE AND RESIDENTIAL IN THE BACK.

I DID A QUICK MEASUREMENT.

THE DEPTH OF THE COMMERCIAL IS ROUGHLY ABOUT 370 FEET.

THAT ALONG WEST WHITE STREET THAT DEPTH IS ROUGHLY ANYWHERE BETWEEN 310 IN SOME AREAS TO EVEN A LITTLE BIT LARGER.

SO IT'S BASICALLY IT WILL CONTINUE THAT DEVELOPMENT PATTERN THAT IS EXISTING RIGHT NOW.

SO IF THE COMMISSION DECIDES TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST, WE HAVE PUT INSIDE YOUR PACKET RECOMMENDATIONS AS IT RELATES TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS THAT WE'VE WORKED WITH THE APPLICANT ON.

I'D BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.

ALSO THE APPLICANT IS HERE WITH A BRIEF PRESENTATION.

OKAY, GREAT. DO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.

AND I MIGHT ADD, I DID RECEIVE ONE LETTER.

IT WAS NEUTRAL TO THE REQUEST.

OKAY. THANK YOU. I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:21 P.M..

DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? IF I MAY, PLEASE. AND THANK YOU AND I APPRECIATE THE TIME TO ADDRESS YOU AGAIN.

FOLLOWING THE TIME THAT WE WERE HERE IN SEPTEMBER, AS ROSS SAID, WE EVALUATED AND UNFORTUNATELY FOUND THAT THE PROJECT THAT WE HAD DESIGNED, ALTHOUGH WE REALLY LIKED IT, WE COULDN'T AFFORD TO BUILD IT, TO BUILD IT IN THIS ENVIRONMENT.

AND SO WE WENT BACK AND RETOOLED BECAUSE WE REALLY WANT TO SEE DEVELOPMENT ON THAT PROPERTY AND REALLY WANT TO WORK WITH YOU GUYS.

AND AS ROSS SAID, WE PULLED OUT THE TOWNHOME PRODUCT.

IT REALLY DIDN'T WORK AND WE DIDN'T HAVE GREAT PRODUCT FOR IT.

I THINK YOU GUYS EXPRESSED THAT YOU DIDN'T LIKE WHAT I HAD SHOWED YOU ON THAT PRODUCT ANYWAY, AND BUT WE DID KEEP THE OTHER ELEMENTS, BOTH THE COURTYARD SERIES, WHICH IS ON THE SFZ AS WELL AS THE TRADITIONAL 40 FOOT AND THE 50 FOOT PRODUCT.

WE KEPT BOTH OF THOSE.

WE ADDED BACK THE SIXTIES OR WE ADDED SOME 60 FOOT LOTS OF 72 TO PUT IN SOME LARGER PRODUCT AS WELL.

AND WE PRESENTED THIS TO COUNCIL IN A WORK SESSION ENVIRONMENT BACK IN OCTOBER AND, AND TOOK SOME RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THEM ON A FEW THINGS ON HOW WE'D CONFIGURED IT.

AND SO WE'RE BACK TO YOU WITH THAT.

THIS MUST BE AUTO SCROLLING FOR ME.

THIS IS OUR 40 FOOT LOT, THE COURTYARD ELEVATION THAT WE'VE SHOWN YOU PREVIOUSLY, WHERE YOU CREATE THE INTERNAL SPACE OF THE YARD.

IT'S REALLY A GREAT PRODUCT WHEN YOU'RE BACKING UP TO A DIFFERENT USE.

SO WE'VE USED THAT IN THE PLAN, UP AGAINST THE FUTURE RETAIL AS WELL AS UP AGAINST THE RIGHT AWAY.

IT PROVIDES A A GREAT TRANSITION THERE AND GREAT INTERNAL SPACE.

SO WE'VE DONE THAT.

SO WE'RE STILL INCLUDING THAT AND WE'VE WORKED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT TO MAKE SURE THERE IS A MINIMUM NUMBER OF THOSE.

SO YOU GUYS ARE GETTING WHAT YOU'RE EXPECTING AND THEY'RE GREAT.

THEY PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PRIVACY, SAFETY, THEY'RE GREAT FOR YOUNG FAMILIES, THEY'RE GOOD FOR SINGLE PARENTS.

AND ACTUALLY SOME WE FOUND SOME EMPTY NESTERS THAT REALLY LIKE THAT.

AND SO IT LAYS OUT A LITTLE BIT WHERE YOU ORIENT THE YARD MORE IN BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND THE IN THE HOUSE. IT'S REALLY A GREAT LITTLE COURTYARD.

WE'VE BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL WITH THAT IN A NUMBER OF LOCATIONS AND REALLY THAT'S WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.

THIS IS A RENDERED AERIAL VIEW.

SO THESE ARE DETACHED GARAGES.

MOST OF THEM ARE THERE, A FEW THAT ARE ATTACHED.

IF YOU GO BACK TO THIS ONE, YOU'LL SEE ONE THAT IS PHYSICALLY ATTACHED, BUT MOST OF THEM ARE PHYSICALLY DETACHED.

THE RENDERING DOESN'T INCLUDE ONE OF THOSE.

AND THEN OUR TRADITIONAL 50 FOOT A LOT PRODUCT, THE THE 40 LOOKS VERY SIMILAR AND THEN THE 60 FOOT PRODUCT IS ACTUALLY A LITTLE BIT LARGER VERSION OF THE SAME.

OR WE JUST ADD SOME BUMP OUTS OR EXTRA GARAGES OR THINGS TO THOSE TO GO ON THE LARGER LOT.

THIS IS THE REVISED PLAN.

ONE OF THE THINGS WE WERE ABLE TO DO IN THIS PLAN IS THE AMENITY SITE, WHICH IS TOWARDS THE WEST SIDE, TOWARDS THE LEFT IS MUCH LARGER THAN IT WAS. WE WERE ABLE TO INCREASE THAT.

THE PARK THAT'S EAST OF THE NORTH SIDE, THE NORTH SOUTH DIVISOR BETWEEN THE PHASES, WE'VE BEEN ABLE TO MAKE THAT A LITTLE BIGGER AS WELL.

BUT WE WERE NOT ABLE TO INCLUDE THE CIVIC SPACE THAT WAS ACROSS THE TOP.

[00:25:07]

IN THE OLD PLAN REALLY.

WE HAD TOO MANY DOUBLE SINGLE LOADED STREETS, WE HAD TOO MUCH DEAD SPACE AND IT WAS JUST COSTING US TOO MUCH TO BUILD IT.

THIS AGAIN, THIS PLAN IS ACTUALLY THREE LOTS FEWER BECAUSE WE GOT RID OF THE TOWNS AND ADDED SOME LARGER ONES.

BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANYTHING I CAN FOR YOU.

COMMISSIONERS HAVE QUESTIONS? I DO. LAST TIME WE WENT DOWN THIS ROAD, I THINK THERE WAS SOME CONCERN ABOUT THE LEONARD TRAILS, THE WALKING TRAILS AND ALL THAT.

THE HEIGHT OF THE BERMS. AND WE'VE SPECIFIED WITHIN THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT WITH STAFF THAT THE BERMS ALONG LEONARD WOULD BE A MINIMUM OF THREE AND A MAXIMUM OF FIVE.

AND WE LIMITED THAT BECAUSE IT JUST BECOMES DIFFICULT WITH THE SIDE SLOPES IF THEY GET ABOVE FIVE.

BUT IT STIPULATES A MINIMUM OF THREE.

SO THAT THAT DIDN'T GET ADDRESSED IN THE FIVE FOOT BECAUSE THAT WAS ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS THAT'S NOT HERE ACTUALLY HAD A BIG CONCERN ABOUT THAT.

I'M SORRY. ONE OF THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS THAT'S NOT HERE TONIGHT ACTUALLY HAD A CONCERN TO THAT, TOO.

AND I DO, TOO, ABOUT THE PRIVACY OF THE WALKING TRAILS.

AND WE HAVE WE'VE ALSO STIPULATED ALONG LEONARD, A SIX FOOT PRIVACY FENCE ALL ALONG THAT AREA BEHIND THE BERM.

SO WE THINK WITH THE BERMS AND THE FENCE THAT'LL BE PUT ACROSS THERE, THAT IT'LL BE WELL PROTECTED.

YEAH, THAT'S WHAT THE PRIVACY FENCE.

OKAY, COOL. THANKS.

SO YOU'LL HAVE THE FENCE AND THE BERMS? YES. OKAY.

I NOTICED THE YOU WERE SHRINKING THAT CIVIC AREA THAT WAS GOING TO BE IN BETWEEN THE C ONE OR THE TWO COMMERCIAL PIECES.

AND THEN THERE WAS THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL THAT FRONTS 455.

AND THEN BEHIND THAT WAS GOING TO BE THAT CITY IT SEEMS LIKE ROUGHLY FIVE ACRES I THINK IS WHAT IT WAS.

THERE'S STILL A LITTLE BIT IT LOOKS LIKE YOU'VE GOT TWO ACRES ON ONE SIDE AND TWO ACRES ON THE OTHER.

WHAT'S THE PLAN FOR THOSE PIECES? THOSE WILL END UP GOING TO THE HOA AND BE PROGRAMED AS OPEN SPACE FOR THE COMMUNITY, WHETHER IT'S A DOG PARK OR A COMMUNITY GARDEN OR WHATEVER IT IS.

SOMETHING IN ADDITION TO THE TWO LARGER PARKS THAT ARE IN BETWEEN.

BUT WE'LL PROGRAM THAT INTO IT.

WE MADE SURE THAT WE ON THE WEST SIDE, THERE'S A CONNECTION TO THE NORTH SOUTH AND THEN THE ONE THAT'S MORE IN THE CENTER OF IT, WHICH IS REALLY JUST ALMOST STRANDED BY THE CONFIGURATION OF THE RESIDENTIAL TO THE NORTH.

SO WE PUT A WALKING TRAIL BETWEEN THE HOUSES SO WE WOULD HAVE ACCESS TO THAT AND SO WE COULD MAINTAIN IT AND TAKE CARE OF IT AND PROGRAM IT.

OKAY. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THIS APPLICANT? ARE THERE ANY SPEAKER CARDS ON THIS ITEM.

NO. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:28.

CONCERNS. OKAY.

IS THERE A MOTION FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 19? I'LL MOTION.

FOR APPROVAL OR DENY? APPROVAL. APPROVAL.

WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.

YEAH. I'M SORRY. WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATION, I'M SORRY.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.

THERE WE GO. OKAY.

I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER NYLAC AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HERMAN.

ALL IN FAVOR.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUS.

ITEM NUMBER 21.

CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACTION ON THE WINTER TRAILS CONCEPT PLAN, APPLICANT RISING WAKULLA INVESTMENTS LP.

THIS IS CONTINGENT ON ITEM NUMBER 20.

MR. ALTOBELLI? YES, MA'AM.

SO THIS CONCEPT PLAN IS CONTINGENT UPON THE ZONING CASE.

THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BASED UPON YOUR RECOMMENDATION.

DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THAT? MOTION FOR APPROVAL.

AND SECOND. I'LL SECOND.

ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN, THE SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER NYLEC.

ALL IN FAVOR.

UNANIMOUS. AND THAT WILL TAKE US TO ITEM NUMBER 22.

CAN I GET LIKE A FIVE MINUTE BREAK BEFORE WE HIT NUMBER 22? WE CERTAINLY CAN.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

WE'LL TAKE A FIVE MINUTE BREAK STARTING AT 7:29.

[00:34:20]

YES. ALL RIGHT, ARE WE READY? ALL RIGHT, WELCOME BACK.

NOW WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 22, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACTION ON A REQUEST TO REZONE 30.1 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF COUNTY ROAD 423, 1410 FEET NORTH OF STATE HIGHWAY FIVE FROM SFE, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT MF2, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY, C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND SF 20, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

THE APPLICANT IS JAMES E HAGER TRUST.

[00:35:03]

MS. MECKE. THE ZONING REQUEST BEFORE YOU MAY BE FAMILIAR.

IT WAS IT CAME BEFORE YOU BACK IN APRIL AND THE APPLICANT HAS MODIFIED THE REQUESTS.

GENERALLY, THE NEW REQUEST HAS REMOVED THE C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL.

REDUCE THE NUMBER OF MULTIFAMILY UNITS FROM 660 UNITS TO 3 TO 538 UNITS.

PROPOSING A TRAFFIC CIRCLE AT THE INTERSECTION OF WEST FINLEY BOULEVARD AND COUNTY ROAD 423.

ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT HAS MODIFIED THE CONCEPT PLAN AND HAVE PROVIDED ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS, SUCH AS RESTRICTING THE BUILDING SETBACKS BY HEIGHT FROM THE EXISTING PECAN GROVE PHASE FOUR SUBDIVISION.

INCREASING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG WEST FINLEY BOULEVARD FROM 20 FEET TO 25 FEET, PRESERVING TREES ALONG THE NORTHERN, WESTERN AND SOUTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARIES.

ON THE SLIDE BEFORE YOU IS A DEPICTION OF THE CONCEPT PLAN WITH THE SURROUNDING ZONING.

TO THE NORTH IS THE ETJ.

TO THE WEST IS THE PECHANGA PHASE FOUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

TO THE SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST IS ZONED SFE, SINGLE FAMILY LARGE LOT.

AND THEN ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER IS C2, GENERAL COMMERCIAL.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO HAVE TOWNHOMES ALONG THE WESTERN BORDER BACKING UP TO THE PECAN GROVE PHASE FOUR NEIGHBORHOOD WITH A 60 FOOT SETBACK FOR ONE AND TWO STORY BUILDINGS.

THE REMAINDER OF THOSE TWO PROPERTIES WOULD BE APARTMENT BUILDINGS WITH SETBACKS FOR HEIGHT FOR THE THREE AND FOUR STORIES.

AND THEN THEY'RE PROPOSING TO PRESERVE THE NORTHEAST CORNER FOR A TENANT THAT CURRENTLY LIVES THERE AS SF 20.

EXCUSE ME. SO ON THIS SLIDE, WHAT I HAVE HIGHLIGHTED FOR YOU ARE THE SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM THEIR PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL.

THE REDUCTION OF THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCES, THE SETBACKS FOR BOTH THREE, FOUR, THREE STORY AND FOUR STORY BUILDINGS, AND THEN ADDING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND ADDING THE ROUNDABOUT.

ALMOST EVERYTHING ELSE WITHIN THE REQUEST HAS STAYED THE SAME.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CALLS FOR THIS PROPERTY TO BE A PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS.

AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS IT'S LOOKING FOR HIGHER EDUCATION, RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY, PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES.

THIS IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST.

AND THE APPLICANT HAS A PRESENTATION.

AND AS FAR AS LETTERS RECEIVED, I RECEIVED ONE IN FAVOR, 28 IN OPPOSITION AND A PETITION WITH 409 SIGNATURES AS OF 1:50 P.M..

THANK YOU. DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ITEM? NO. OKAY.

I WILL OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:38 P.M..

DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? YES. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

MY NAME IS ALVIN JOHNSON, AND I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE HAGER RANCH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.

A COUPLE OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES THAT WE WANTED TO BRING ABOUT.

THERE WERE SEVERAL, OF COURSE, SEVERAL PEOPLE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS DEVELOPMENT.

I THINK SEVERAL OF THE REASONS ARE SOME OF THE REASONS WHERE WE HAD PROPOSED FOUR STORY BUILDINGS THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT.

AND SO THAT WAS REALLY LEANING TO MAYBE SOME OF THE OTHER RESIDENTS THAT THAT WAS TOO HIGH UP AGAINST SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE.

SO ALL OF THESE BUILDINGS THAT ARE COLOR, THAT ARE COLORED HERE, WE HAVE LOWERED THOSE TWO THREE STORY BUILDINGS.

THE ONLY FOUR STORY BUILDINGS ARE THE ONES THAT ARE DIRECTLY NEXT TO THE PARKING GARAGES.

SO WE HAVE REDUCED THE UNIT COUNT, LOWERED THE BUILDINGS TO THREE STORIES.

AND THEN, AS LOREN SAID, WE HAVE THE BUFFER AGAINST THE PECAN GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD WITH TWO STOREY TOWNHOMES.

ANOTHER SIGNIFICANT CHANGE HERE THAT WE DID NOT HAVE BEFORE, SORRY ABOUT THAT WAS THE ROUNDABOUT ON 423.

IT'S JUST MY UNDERSTANDING FROM TALKS IN THE AREA THAT PECAN GROVE HAS HAD A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC CONCERNS, PEOPLE GETTING IN AND OUT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

THIS PARTICULAR WEST FINLEY EXTENSION FROM THE BACK OF PECAN GROVE OUT TO STATE FIVE INCLUDING A ROUNDABOUT WOULD DEFINITELY SOLVE THE PROBLEMS THAT WE'VE HEARD THAT MOST OF THE RESIDENTS THAT HAVE BEEN OPPOSED TO THIS HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET OUT OF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD BY HAVING JUST A GREAT RIGHT OF

[00:40:01]

WAY AND THEN THE ROUNDABOUT OUT TO STATE FIVE.

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE TAKEN ON AND WITH THE AGREED UPON DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE IN PLACE WITH THE CITY ALREADY.

AND SO WE REALLY THOUGHT BY REDUCING THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDINGS, REDUCING THE UNIT COUNT, PUTTING IN A ROUNDABOUT, THAT WOULD NOT ONLY HELP THIS DEVELOPMENT AND RESIDENTS GET INTO IN AND OUT OF THIS NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT ALSO BY HELPING THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF PECAN GROVE AND HAVE AN EXIT FOR OUR RESIDENTS TO BE ABLE TO GET.

ADDITIONALLY, MONETARILY I'LL TELL YOU THAT THIS PARTICULAR PIECE OF LAND, 30 ACRES IS NOT A BIG TAX BASE FOR THE CITY RIGHT NOW.

BUT BY BEING ABLE TO CONVERT THIS INTO SOME REALLY LUXURY HOMES, INCLUDING TOWNHOMES AND LAUREN, CAN YOU PULL UP THAT OTHER? SHE'S GOING TO PUT IN ANOTHER SLIDE FOR US.

YES, I THINK THAT'S IT.

SO THIS IS OUR THREE AND FOUR STORY BUILDING, REALLY, REALLY NICE LOOKING PRODUCT.

AND THEN THE NEXT ONE IS A TOWNHOME.

THIS IS A TWO STORY TOWNHOME BUFFER THAT WILL BE UP AGAINST THE PECAN GROVE NEIGHBORHOOD IS TOWNHOMES AND HAVING SOME REALLY NICE HIGH END HOMES THAT LOOK LIKE THIS REALLY NICE DEVELOPMENT OF APARTMENTS FOR THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE GOING TO ACTUALLY LIVE IN APARTMENTS.

WE THOUGHT THIS WOULD BE A REALLY, REALLY GREAT ASSET TO THE AREA.

IT ALSO CREATES ABOUT $358 MILLION OF ECONOMIC IMPACT TO THE CITY OF ANNA, WHICH IS A BIG TAX BASE.

A LOT OF PEOPLE LIVING HERE, A LOT OF RESIDENTS THAT WILL WORK HERE, SHOP HERE, SUPPORT LOCAL BUSINESSES HERE.

AND SO WE THOUGHT THIS WOULD BE A GREAT ADDITION TO THE AREA.

THANK YOU. IT WAS.

IT WAS THE ONE THAT YOU HAD ALREADY SHOWN THAT ONE.

OKAY, SO WE'RE GOOD. IT'S JUST WHAT WE HAD ORIGINALLY PLANNED FOR THE TOP RIGHT PORTION OF THAT TO BE A COMMUNITY GARDEN, COMMUNITY PARK. BUT INSTEAD WE HAD TO TAKE IT OUT AND REDUCE IT TO GET THE ROUNDABOUT IN, BECAUSE THE ROUNDABOUT WAS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THAT ADDITIONAL GREEN SPACE FOR JUST A PARK. SO WE STILL HAVE A LARGE PARK THERE, BUT THE ROUNDABOUT ADDS SO MUCH MORE LEEWAY FOR TRAFFIC IN AND OUT OF THE AREA, BUT ALSO PROVIDING RELIEF FOR PECAN GROVE IN THE BACK.

SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY, WE DO HAVE SPEAKER CARDS.

START WITH MANNY SINGH.

TESTING. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

MY NAME IS MANNY SINGH, LIVE AT 1001 HOLLY STREET IN PECAN GROVE, PHASE TWO.

SO TODAY'S MATTER CONCERNS AND A BUSINESS CORRIDOR, AN IMPORTANT SET OF INTERSECTIONS THAT INCLUDE STATE HIGHWAY FIVE, COLLIN COUNTY, OUTER LOOP, HIGHWAY 75, HIGHWAY 121. THIS AREA SPECIFICALLY ZONED TO ATTRACT CORPORATE PROFESSIONAL INVESTMENT TO PREVENT EMPLOYMENT LEAKAGE TO NEIGHBORING CITIES, AMONG OTHER PURPOSES. ADDITIONALLY, THESE DEVELOPMENTS WILL ASSIST IN PROVIDING MORE VALUE TO OUR COMMUNITY AND COULD BE AND COULD BE, FOR EXAMPLE, A STRATEGIC LOCATION FOR SUPPLIERS RELATED TO THE SHERMAN SEMICONDUCTOR DEVELOPMENTS.

$30 BILLION IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN.

WE CURRENTLY HAVE OVER 400 PLUS SIGNATURES, AS STATED BY LOREN TO MY LEFT OF VOTING RESIDENTS IN PECAN GROVE, AND THAT'S ONLY WITH A SHORT LEAD TIME AS WELL TO PROCURE THEM.

FURTHERMORE, AS YOU GUYS KNOW, THIS IS THE THIRD ATTEMPT BY THE DEVELOPER.

THE PREVIOUS TWO WERE ON APRIL 4TH, THE PLANNING AND ZONING, AND IT WAS DENIED APRIL 12TH TO CITY COUNCIL AND IT WAS ALSO DENIED.

IT WAS STATED THAT, QUOTE, PROPOSED ZONING REQUEST DOES NOT MEET CHARACTER AND INTENT OF THE FUTURE USE AND USE PLAN.

THE MODIFIED REQUEST AND DEVELOPMENT LAYOUT IS NEARLY IDENTICAL TO THE INITIAL ZONING APPLICATION, EXCEPT FOR REMOVING THE COMMERCIAL ZONING COMPONENT AND ADDING A ROUNDABOUT AT THE INTERSECTION OF FINLEY AND CR 423.

FOR THE REASONS ABOVE AND THOSE THAT FOLLOW, WE WILL CONTINUE TO BE STEADFAST IN OUR DETERMINATION TO PUSH BACK ON ANY ATTEMPTS TO REVISE THE CURRENT ZONING AS THEY WOULD CONFLICT WITH THE 2050 COMPREHENSIVE PLANS THAT ANNA'S RESIDENTS AND THE COUNCIL AGREED UPON.

THESE PLANS WERE USED BY CURRENT AND POTENTIAL RESIDENTS TO FINALIZE THE DECISIONS ON THEIR HOME PURCHASES WITHIN A FEW MILE RADIUS.

WE HAVE SEVEN OR MORE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PIPELINE OR COMPLETED.

THEY ARE ANNA PALLADIUM, 120 UNITS, PALLADIUM EAST CROSSING 239 UNITS.

THE GRAND AT ATS 280 UNITS.

WATERVIEW MULTIFAMILY, 325 UNITS.

PARAMAR, 185 UNITS.

VILLAGES OF WATER CREEK, 325 UNITS, SERENITY 325 UNITS.

AND THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE THE 500 THAT IS LISTED TODAY.

THAT IS APPROXIMATELY 1800 IN TOTAL.

[00:45:03]

FURTHERMORE, THE FOLLOWING AREAS ARE ALREADY ZONED FOR MULTIFAMILY URBAN USE AS WELL RIGHT BEHIND ANNA RANCH RETAIL.

THERE'S ANOTHER ONE ACROSS FROM PECAN GROVE THAT'S MULTIFAMILY URBAN LIVING.

AND THEN THERE'S ALSO ANOTHER ONE ON THE NORTHEAST SIDE OF ANNA TOWN SQUARE.

THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL CAUSE FURTHER STRAINS ON TRAFFIC IN HIGHWAY FIVE CORRIDOR FROM COLLIN COUNTY OUTER LOOP TO WHITE STREET.

ADDITIONALLY, IT'S ALREADY IN AN AREA OF CONCERN DUE TO INCREASED CRASHES AND THAT ONE FATALITY, AS SHOWN ON PAGE 65 OF YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THE OVERDEVELOPMENT OF THIS CORRIDOR WITH MULTIFAMILY UNITS INSTEAD OF PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS DEVELOPMENTS WHICH WOULD PROVIDE A GREATER RETURN ON INVESTMENT, IS NOT, AND ANYTHING OPPOSED TO THAT IS NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF LOCAL CONSTITUENTS.

FOR EXAMPLE, AS I'VE STATED BEFORE, THERE'S A LOT OF SPACE HERE FOR SUPPLIERS RELATED TO THE MULTIBILLION DOLLAR SEMICONDUCTOR INVESTMENTS IN SHERMAN.

EXCUSE ME. YEAH, YOU HAVE A THREE MINUTE LIMIT AND YOU HIT THAT LIMIT.

SO IF YOU CAN FINISH YOUR THOUGHT AND THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO HER, I KNOW YOU'RE GOING TO SPEAK FOR HER, AND THEN WE'LL JUST CONTINUE WITH THAT.

APPRECIATE IT, THANK YOU SO MUCH.

SO JUST FINISHING UP ON THIS LAST SENTENCE.

THIS COULD BE IDEAL LOCATION FOR SUPPLIERS RELATED TO MULTI BILLION DOLLAR SEMICONDUCTOR INVESTMENTS IN SHERMAN, WHICH WOULD PROVIDE MORE OF A VALUE TO US AND THE CITY IN A BETTER TAX BASE THAN JUST MULTIFAMILY UNITS SINCE THERE ALREADY IS A PLETHORA OF THEM.

SO I'LL PAUSE THERE. OKAY.

SO THE NEXT SPEAKER WOULD BE GRETCHEN STUART AND I'M UNDERSTANDING HE'S GOING TO READ YOUR.

OKAY, CONTINUE, 3 MINUTES.

AND THANK YOU SO MUCH. REALLY APPRECIATE IT.

OF COURSE.

I'M ALMOST DONE HERE. SO JUST ANOTHER MINUTE OR TWO.

WITH THE BOND RECENTLY PASSING, THERE IS A LAG TIME AS WELL WITH THE EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT MAY NOT BE ALIGNED TO THE OPENINGS OF MULTIFAMILY UNITS, CAUSING MORE PRESSURE ON OUR ANNA SYSTEM.

WITH MELISSA ISD NEXT NEXT DOOR, OUR COMPETITIVENESS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVER AS WE WORK TO BUILD OUR SCHOOL TO CAREER PIPELINES WITH THE NUMEROUS CORPORATIONS AND SUPPLIERS ALONG THE HIGHWAY 75 SHERMAN TO MCKINNEY TECHNOLOGY CORRIDOR.

IN CLOSING, I ONCE AGAIN APPRECIATE YOU ALL TAKING THE TIME TO HEAR FROM YOUR CONSTITUENTS.

WE ARE IN A UNIQUE POSITION TO LEARN FROM THE SETBACKS AND THE SUCCESSES OF NEIGHBORING CITIES.

I WOULD HUMBLY REQUEST THAT YOU CONSIDER OUR CONCERNS TO ENSURE THE APPROPRIATE DEVELOPMENT OF ANNA BUSINESS CORRIDOR.

AND THAT IS ALL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU. THE NEXT SPEAKER I HAVE IS TONY BELAFONT.

I'M TONY BELAFONT, LIVE AT 2934 PECAN GROVE DRIVE IN ANNA.

MY BIG CONCERNS WITH A LOT OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS IS THE STRAIN IT'S GOING TO ADD TO THE CITY.

BOTH FIRE POLICE, SOME OF THE FEDERAL PROBLEMS THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE WITH RESIDENTIAL MAIL DELIVERY AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE, WHICH HAVE NOT SEEMED TO HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. ROUNDABOUTS IN MY OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE AND I'VE BEEN A PROFESSIONAL DRIVER FOR OVER 40 YEARS, CREATES NOTHING BUT TRAFFIC HAZARDS AND LOTS AND LOTS OF ACCIDENTS.

IN A SMALL COMMUNITY LIKE WE'RE LIVING IN AT THIS POINT AND PECAN GROVE DRIVE.

TO ME, THAT'S TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE.

THIS COULD BE FIXED.

BUT IF WE RUBBER STAMP THE WHOLE THING, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE FEASIBLE, IN MY OPINION.

AND WE'RE GOING TO BE ASKING FOR TROUBLE.

A LOT OF THINGS THAT ARE GOING ON IN THE CITY, WHICH ARE REALLY GREAT.

BUT WE SEEM TO BE FORGETTING A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE REASONS.

A LOT OF PEOPLE MOVED IN AND IT WAS BECAUSE IT WAS A SMALLER COMMUNITY, IT WAS RESIDENTIAL, AND IT WAS SORT OF RURAL.

PUTTING UP ALL THESE BIG BUILDINGS TAKES AWAY FROM THAT AND IN MY OPINION, IS NOT GOING TO HELP IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA WITH THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT.

I APPRECIATE YOU LETTING ME HAVE THE TIME TO SPEAK.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:49 P.M.

AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF.

ANY QUESTIONS, CONCERNS.

STEPH, COULD YOU PULL UP THE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP? YOU MAKE THAT AVAILABLE.

NOW THE ONE OFF TO 2050 THAT SHOWS BASICALLY THE THE BIG ONE, THE ANTI-BUSINESS CORRIDOR, YOU KNOW, THE WHOLE THE WHOLE CITY AND WHAT IS CONSIDERED PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS.

I MEAN, IF WE LOOK AT THAT, ONCE YOU GET IT OUT THAT THERE'S VERY LITTLE SET ASIDE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THE FUTURE LAND USE FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. AND THAT AREA IS PART OF THAT PLAN.

AND SO, LIKE THE GENTLEMAN SAID, YOU KNOW, THE SEMICONDUCTOR PLANT GOING IN, SO MUCH GROWTH IN THE AREA.

[00:50:06]

THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY OR A PLACE THAT ANNA CAN USE FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT.

AND IF WE SQUEEZE, YOU KNOW, KEEP TAKING LAND AWAY FROM THAT POTENTIAL, I THINK WE ARE HURTING ANNA ITSELF.

SO, YOU KNOW, I THINK WE NEED TO STAY WITH INTENDED USE, THE APPROVED USE FOR THIS LAND, WHICH IS PART OF THAT, ANNA BUSINESS CORRIDOR, IN MY OPINION. AND WHEN IT CAME TO, IT CAME TO P AND Z IN APRIL.

IT DIDN'T MEET THE FUTURE LAND USE PLANS THEN, AND I DON'T THINK IT DOES NOW.

YEAH, I THINK THAT'S MY BIGGEST CONCERN IS, YOU KNOW, THE FUTURE LAND USE SHOWS PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS AND THIS IS A DEVIATION FROM THAT ZONING.

WE HAVE MULTIFAMILY ZONING THROUGHOUT THE CITY.

YEAH, I'M INCLINED TO TO STICK WITH BECAUSE THIS IS CURRENTLY IN THE ETJ, NO, IT'S IN THE CITY.

IT'S CURRENTLY SFE OK.

BUT FUTURE LAND USE.

IT JUST DOESN'T MEAN IT.

YEAH. I NOTICED THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.

SHE FILLED OUT A FORM THAT NOBODY CALLED FOR HER.

WE'LL ALLOW IT.

I'M LEAH [INAUDIBLE] I ACTUALLY REPRESENT THE SELLER? AND I JUST WANTED TO SPEAK ON MR. WENZEL ABOUT THE COMP PLAN.

WE SEE IT THAT THAT WILL BE A 15 YEAR OUT BEFORE THAT EVEN HAPPENS WITH THE PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS.

AND WHEN I LIST A PROPERTY HERE IN ANNA, JUST TO BACK UP A LITTLE BIT, I'VE DONE PROPERTIES OVER IN TOWN SQUARE WORKING WITH THOSE ETJS AND THEY'RE PUTTING IN MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF MULTIFAMILY, WHICH Y'ALL ARE AWARE OF THAT'S ABOUT TO GO UP AND THEY DON'T HAVE TO GET APPROVAL FOR ALL THIS STUFF BECAUSE IT'S IN THE ETJ.

BUT BECAUSE THEY'RE CITY ANNEXED, THEY HAVE TO GET APPROVAL FOR THIS.

SO I JUST WANTED TO STATE BEFORE I GO INTO ABOUT WHAT I DID, I'M KIND OF BACKTRACKING HERE.

THE LAND THAT'S NORTH OF THIS, WHICH IS COPELAND RANCH, ALSO REPRESENT THAT FAMILY, WHICH IS JASON ADAMS FAMILY.

THAT IS ALSO RELEVANT TO HAGER RANCH.

I DON'T KNOW IF PEOPLE KNOW BECAUSE IT'S IN THE ETJ, THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO GET APPROVAL FOR THAT.

THERE'S GOING TO BE 155 RESIDENTS ARE GOING TO BE COMING THERE AS WELL.

SO THAT'S WHY THE ROUNDABOUT WAS SO IMPORTANT TO TALK ABOUT, TO PUT IN SO WE COULD ALLEVIATE SOME OF THE TRAFFIC.

THERE'S NOT ANOTHER DEVELOPER THAT I'VE WORKED WITH HERE IN ANNA AND I'VE WORKED WITH QUITE A BIT.

I'VE JUST NEVER MET YOU ALL BEFORE.

THEY DON'T OFFER TO PAY FOR ROADS.

THIS BUYER HAS OFFERED TO PAY TO PAY THE 423, WHICH IS IN FRONT OF HAGER.

THEY HAVE OFFERED TO TAKE FINLEY ROAD FROM PECAN GROVE ALL THE WAY THROUGH HAGER AND THEN ALL THE WAY TO THE FIVE.

SO THEY ARE INVESTING IN ANNA.

AND LIKE MR. ALVIN JOHNSON SAID EARLIER, CURRENTLY RIGHT NOW, THAT LAND BRINGS IN ABOUT $5,000 REVENUE TO THE CITY OF ANNA.

AND IN THE FUTURE IT'S GOING TO BE ABOUT $385 MILLION IN REVENUE TO THE CITY.

AND SO LET ME GO BACK TO MY POINT.

WHEN I FIRST STARTED SELLING HERE IN ANNA, I IMMEDIATELY CAME UP TO THE CITY AND ASKED WHAT WOULD THEY LIKE TO SEE AT HAGER RANCH? BECAUSE THAT WAS THE VERY FIRST PROJECT I STARTED WITH, WITH ASKING BEFORE BEING A REALTOR FOR 23 YEARS, I NEVER WOULD ASK.

AND THEY SAID, WE'RE LOOKING FOR A MIXED USE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT.

SO I WENT OUT AND I FOUND THE BUYER FOR THIS PROJECT, JUST LIKE I FOUND THE BUYER FOR THE PROJECT IN ANNA TOWN SQUARE.

AND JUST LIKE I FOUND THE BUYER FOR THE PROJECT AT COPELAND RANCH, WHICH IS NORTH OF HAGER RANCH.

SO I HOPE YOU ALL TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT.

I TRY TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE BUYERS, EVEN THOUGH I DON'T REPRESENT THEM OR REPRESENT THE SELLERS THAT WE PUT IN A PRODUCT THAT THE CITY CAN UTILIZE, THAT THE HOMEOWNERS WILL BE HAPPY ABOUT, THAT THEY'RE AROUND.

I THINK MAYBE THERE'S JUST A MISCONCEPTION WITH THE PECAN GROVE RESIDENTS.

IT'S A BAD THING RIGHT NOW.

THEY ONLY HAVE ONE WAY OUT OF THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD.

THIS IS GOING TO GIVE THEM TWO WAYS OUT.

WE THINK IT IS VERY SAFE WITH REDOING THE 423, PUTTING IN THE ROUNDABOUT AND TAKING IT ALL THE WAY TO THE FIVE.

SO THANK YOU ALL FOR LETTING ME INTERRUPT.

LEAH [INAUDIBLE], THANK YOU.

I APOLOGIZE FOR SKIPPING YOU.

IT WAS STUCK BEHIND THE ONE PAPER.

I'M SORRY. WELL, NORMALLY, I DON'T THINK REALTORS REALLY TALK, BUT I FEEL LIKE SINCE I'M SO APART OF ALL THE DEVELOPMENT GOING ON AND I'VE NEVER COME UP AND SPEAK THAT I KNOW ALL THESE PEOPLE FROM WORKING WITH THEM ALL THE TIME, BUT I'M ALWAYS THE QUIET ONE.

SO THANK YOU ALL FOR HEARING ME.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

YEAH. SO I THINK THAT THE CONCERN IS THAT THIS LAND WAS ALREADY ALLOCATED TOWARDS SOMETHING ELSE, AND

[00:55:02]

AS THAT GETS INFRINGED UPON, IT NEVER GETS ADDED BACK SOMEWHERE ELSE.

SO I THINK WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO SAY IS BECAUSE OF IT'S BEING ALLOCATED AS A PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS, THAT IF THIS AREA WAS TO BE REZONED TO SOMETHING THAT'S NOT PROFESSIONAL CAMPUS, THAT WE WOULD NEED TO ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL LAND SOMEPLACE ELSE TO.

ACCOMMODATE. IS THAT CORRECT? BUT NOBODY'S DOING THAT.

YOU KNOW, THEY'RE JUST TAKING AWAY AND NOT ADDING BACK.

CORRECT. AND THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING.

SO WHEN ZONING CASES DO COME FORWARD, YOU KNOW, IT WILL BE OUR RESPONSIBILITY, STAFF'S RESPONSIBILITY TO COME BACK BEFORE YOU ALL AND TO SAY, ALL RIGHT, HOW ARE WE DOING WITH OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? HOW ARE WE DOING WITH OUR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN? WHAT AREAS HAVE BEEN REMOVED OR WHAT AREAS ARE NOT MATCHING OR WHAT ZONING HAS BEEN APPROVED THAT DOESN'T MATCH THAT? THAT'S ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

AND THEN AGAIN, TAKING A LOOK TO SAY, OKAY, DO WE REALLOCATE THAT AREA? DO WE REMOVE THESE SECTIONS? BUT AGAIN, THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO DO IN THE FUTURE, STAFF WOULD NEED TO DO.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? IS THERE A MOTION FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 22? MOTION TO DENY.

I HAVE A MOTION TO DENY BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

IS THERE A SECOND? I SECOND.

AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER NYLEC.

ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUS.

ITEM NUMBER 23, CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACTION ON THE HAGER RANCH CONCEPT PLAN.

APPLICANT JAMES E HAGER TRUST.

MISS MECKE. THIS IS CONTINGENT ON 22, CORRECT? YES, MA'AM. OKAY.

IS THERE A MOTION ON NUMBER 23? TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE DENY 23.

AND A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.

WOW. I'LL GO WITH COMMISSIONER HERMAN ON THAT ONE.

I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WENZEL AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HERMAN FOR DENIAL.

PASSES UNANIMOUS.

ITEM NUMBER 24, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING.

CONSIDER, DISCUSS ACTION ON A REQUEST TO REZONE 82 PLUS OR MINUS ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST FOSTER CROSSING BOULEVARD, 195 FEET EAST OF SOUTH PALO PARKWAY.

FROM PLAN DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SEVEN.

I AM THE OWNER OF THAT LAND [INAUDIBLE] 23. I WANT TO SEE WHERE IT'S DOCUMENTED MY THAT OFFERED MY GRANDFATHER BACK IN THE EIGHTIES FOR MONEY FOR IT AND HE DENIED IT.

I WANT TO SEE THIS PAPERWORK YOU ALL ARE TALKING ABOUT BECAUSE IT'S NOT THERE.

AT ALL. SO I KNOW, I KNOW.

. WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE WITH ITEM NUMBER 24.

7432017 AND ORDINANCE NUMBER 9332021, TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT LL1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WITH MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. APPLICANT IS PC FIVE PROPERTIES LLC, CO MICHAEL POIRIER, SECRETARY.

MISS MECKE. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED TO TABLE AND HOLD OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ITEM UNTIL THE TUESDAY, JANUARY 3RD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TO BE LOCATED AT THE MUNICIPAL COMPLEX 120 WEST SEVENTH STREET AT SEVEN.

I WILL MOTION TO TABLE AND HOLD OPEN ITEM NUMBER 24 UNTIL THE JANUARY 3RD, 2023 PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING TO BE HELD AT ANNA CITY HALL 120 WEST SEVENTH STREET AT 7 P.M..

DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND IT. I HAVE A MOTION BY MYSELF AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER WENZEL.

ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUS.

THIS IS OUR LAST P&Z MEETING OF 2022.

AND I WANT TO THANK ALL THE COMMISSIONERS FOR THEIR TIME AND THEIR DEDICATION TO THE NEIGHBORS OF ANNA.

IS THERE A MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT? I MOTION.

MOTION FOR ADJOURNMENT BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

I WILL SECOND.

[01:00:02]

ALL IN FAVOR.

AT 8 P.M..

THANK YOU ALL.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.